Sanctifying evidentialism
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20310738 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Horace L Fairlamb (corresponding author), Horace Fairlamb |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 61-76 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412509990187 |
| OpenAlex | W4238232365 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 7 |
In contemporary epistemology of religion, evidentialism has been included in a wider critique of traditional foundationalist theories of rational belief. To show the irrelevance of evidentialism, some critics have offered alternatives to the foundationalist approach, prominent among which is Alvin Plantinga's ‘warrant as proper function’. But the connection between evidentialism and foundationalism has been exaggerated, and criticisms of traditional foundationalism do not discredit evidentialism in principle. Furthermore, appeals to warranted belief imply that the heart of evidentialism – the proportioning of belief to rational grounds – has not been discredited but assimilated to the reliabilist view of knowledge by expanding the concept of evidence to include religious experience. In the end, the warrant concept extends the reach of evidentialism, thereby enhancing rather than diminishing its relevance for rational belief
Economics · Epistemology · Foundationalism · Political science · Relevance (law) · Warrant · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.08 |
| Citation span | 2013 - 2013 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |