The essential divine-perfection objection to the free-will defence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20311683 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Alexander R Pru (0000-0002-0069-532X, Baylor University, corresponding author), Alexander R Pruss |
| Year | 2008 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 433-444 |
| Publication date | 2008-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religious Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0034-4125 • E-ISSN: 1469-901X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0034412508009657 |
| OpenAlex | W2105908778 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 3 |
The free-will defence (FWD) holds that the value of significant free will is so great that God is justified in creating significantly free creatures even if there is a risk or certainty that these creatures will sin. A difficulty for the FWD, developed carefully by Quentin Smith, is that God is unable to do evil, and yet surely lacks no genuinely valuable kind of freedom. Smith argues that the kind of freedom that God has can be had by creatures, without a risk of creatures doing evil. I shall show that Smith's argument fails – the case of God is disanalogous to the case of creatures precisely because creatures are creatures
Argument (complex analysis) · Certainty · Creatures · Epistemology · Free will · Natural (archaeology) · Perfection · Problem of Evil · Value (mathematics) · Chemistry · Computer Science · Free Will and Agency · History · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |