Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Samuel Hartlib’s influence on the early history of The Royal Society

Bibliographic Data

ID20316004
AuthorsG H Turnbull (Department of Education, The University, Sheffield, corresponding author)
Year1953
Volume10
Issue2
Pages101-130
Publication date1953-04-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNotes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0035-9149 • E-ISSN: 1743-0178
PublisherThe Royal Society (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1098/rsnr.1953.0006
OpenAlexW2016445384
LanguageEN
Citations received10

In a valuable article1 on ‘The origins of the Royal Society’ Miss R. H. Syfret considers various possible influences on the foundation of the Royal Society, among them that of John Amos Comenius and his group of friends in England, particularly Samuel Hartlib and Theodore Haak. She mentions also J. V. Andreae, to whose writings Comenius owed much, but comes to the conclusion that he was only one of many influences on the schemes of what she calls the Comenian group and that his connexion with the Royal Society, depending as it does on his relation to the Comenian group and then on their relation to the Royal Society, is at best remote and indirect.2 She then considers the question of the connexion between the Comenian group and the group that in 1645 began the meetings which led to the foundation of the Royal Society, and finds enough circumstantial evidence to show some connexion between the two groups.3 She holds that the publication of Comenius’s Via Lucis in 1668 and its dedication to the Royal Society supports, in a general way but by no means exclusively, the supposition of a connexion between the two groups.4 She believes that, if the Invisible College were indeed, as has always been assumed, Dr Wallis’s scientific group, this fact would point quite conclusively to the Royal Society’s origins in the schemes of Samuel Hartlib ; but, after considering various points about the Invisible College, she concludes that it seems that it was something quite different from that group.5

Circumstantial evidence · Foundation (evidence) · Political science · Relation (database) · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Classics · Computer Science · Historical and Literary Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

  • The accompt of William Balle from 28 November 1660 to 11 September 1663

    Open Access•R E W Maddison•Notes and Records the Royal…•1960

  • The Universities and Science in Seventeenth Century England

    Open Access•Barbara J Shapiro, Barbara Shapiro•Journal of British Studies•1971

  • The Nature of the Early Royal Society Part II

    Open Access•K Theodore Hoppen•The British Journal for the…•1976

  • The Nature of the Early Royal Society

    Open Access•K Theodore Hoppen•The British Journal for the…•1976

  • John Beale, philosophical gardener of Herefordshire

    Mayling Stubbs•Annals of Science•1982

  • Robert Boyle's early intellectual evolution

    Michael Hunter•Intellectual History Review•2014

  • Deconstructing Glass and Building up Shards at the Early Royal Society

    Open Access•Ruth Ezra•Renaissance Quarterly•2022

  • New Light on the Invisible College the Social Relations of English Science in the Mid-Seventeenth Century

    Open Access•Charles Webster•Transactions of the Royal…•1974

  • The pharmakon of ‘If’

    Open Access•Michael Wintroub•The British Journal for the…•2019

  • John Bulwer and the Quest for a Universal Language, 1641-1644

    Jeffrey Wollock•Historiographia Linguistica•2011

Citations per year0.15
Citation span1960 - 2022 (63)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae