Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Deprogramming Baconianism

The meaning of desiderata in the eighteenth century

Bibliographic Data

ID20316631
AuthorsVera Keller (0000-0002-9933-4590, Robert D. Clark Honors College, University of Oregon, 1293 University Street, Eugene, OR 97403, USA, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume72
Issue2
Pages119-137
Publication date2018-06-20
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueNotes and Records the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0035-9149 • E-ISSN: 1743-0178
PublisherThe Royal Society (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1098/rsnr.2018.0008
OpenAlexW2801259993
LanguageEN
Citations received5

The historiographical construct of the ‘Baconian programme’ rose to prominence in the mid-twentieth century. It has since shaped views of Bacon and his followers, particularly concerning Bacon's utilitarianism. It has also set expectations concerning how defined and prescriptive Bacon's vision of the future ought to be for later Baconians. Yet, neither Bacon nor those who claimed to follow him thought of his work in programmatic ways. The early modern view of Bacon's futuristic writing allowed his followers great agency in re-sketching it to fit changing times. This essay first follows the rise of a ‘Baconian programme’ in historiography. It then returns to the past to outline some of the rich vocabulary for future-oriented writing deployed by the first generation of Bacon's self-proclaimed followers. Finally, testing how Bacon's plans appeared over a longer durée, it skips forward to Peter Shaw (1694–1763) and Joseph Priestley (1733–1804). Shaw employed one of Bacon's futuristic terms (desiderata), dropped another (optativa) and developed the significance of a new category (hint). Shaw's case illustrates the creativity that even Bacon's most ardent followers expected to be within their rights. Baconianism invited future redrafting and haphazard invention, rather than adherence to a predictive programme

Agency (philosophy) · Construct (python library) · Creativity · Epistemology · Historiography · Meaning (existential) · Political science · Sociology · Utilitarianism · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · Law · Philosophy

  • Queries in early-modern English science

    Robert Yeo•Intellectual History Review•2022

  • By any other name

    Eric H Ash•History and Technology•2019

  • Daring to Conjecture in Seventeenth- and Eighteenth-Century Sciences

    Catherine Abou-Nemeh•Isis•2022

  • The Works of Francis Bacon

    Lukas M Verburgt•Isis•2021

  • "A "Wild Swing to Phantsy

    Open Access•Vera Keller•Isis•2021

Unique citing works5
Citations per year0,71
Citation span2019 - 2022 (4)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae