On the Parity between Secular and Religious Reasons
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20317411 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Caroline Laborde (0000-0003-3369-518X, corresponding author), Cécile Laborde |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 575-587 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Theory and Practice (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0037-802X • E-ISSN: 2154-123X |
| Publisher | Philosophy Documentation Center (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.5840/soctheorpract2021614133 |
| OpenAlex | W3177242004 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The contributors to this Special Issue all suggest that Christianity is compatible with political liberalism. In this paper, I first illuminate the grounds of this compatibility. I then focus on one distinctive—yet unexplored—premise of the compatibility argument. This is the thought that religious and secular reasons are essentially on a par, in terms of their contribution to public reasoning. I critically examine Christopher Eberle’s claim that, as their epistemological status is equivalent, both secular and religious reasons may play a decisive role in justifying coercion-related state policies, including in contexts of war
Christianity · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Premise · Public reason · Secular education · Secular state · Sociology · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious studies · War, Ethics, and Justification
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |