Controversial to whom? A defense of the intra-scientific consensus view
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 24230477 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Cristóbal Bellolio (0000-0002-7547-7773) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-12 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Contemporary Political Theory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1470-8914 • E-ISSN: 1476-9336 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41296-026-00855-3 |
| OpenAlex | W7221525598 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 76 |
comprehensive doctrines · John Rawls · judicial impartiality · political liberalism · public justification · Public reason · Scientific consensus · scientific uncertainty · Technocracy · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Political Philosophy and Ethics
The Enigma of Reason
Reason in a Dark Time
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
In defence of the value free ideal
At Least Bias Is Bipartisan
The Political Divide on Climate Change
The role of trust for climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviour
Communicating climate change risks in a skeptical world
Science in a Democratic Society
Liberalism without Perfection
Rescuing Public Reason Liberalism’s Accessibility Requirement
Fact-Dependent Policy Disagreements and Political Legitimacy
Against Public Reason Liberalism's Accessibility Requirement
Public reason liberalism
Two Concepts of Liberalism
Public justification and expert disagreement over non-pharmaceutical interventions for the Covid-19 pandemic
The Role of Experts in Public Deliberations. A Rawlsian Epistemically Responsible Democracy
Science-related populism
The nature and origins of political polarization over science
Contesting epistemic authority
Learning from Covid-19
On the Parity between Secular and Religious Reasons
The Epistemology of Frozen Peas
The Truth About Denial
Critical Elitism
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
Knowledge politics and post-truth in climate denial
Understanding (and Reducing) Inaction on Climate Change
Does public justification face an ‘expert problem’? Some thoughts in light of the Covid-19 pandemic
Accessibility, pluralism, and honesty
Science as Public Reason and the Controversiality Objection
Scientific Facts and Methods in Public Reason
Science as Public Reason
Due deference to denialism
To Hedge or Not to Hedge
Inductive Risk and Values in Science
Public reason, values in science, and the shifting boundaries of the political forum
Experts
Science for the post-normal age
Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion
The Scope and Language of Science
Political ideology and views about climate change in the European Union
Anti-Covid = Anti-science? How protesters against Covid-19 measures appropriate science to navigate the information environment
An inquiry into populism’s relation to science
Power and Truth in Science-Related Populism
Fact-Checking
Covid-19 and the Paradox of Scientific Advice
Epistemic democracy and the role of experts
Can We Win the War on Science? Understanding the Link between Political Populism and Anti-Science Politics
Cultural cognition of scientific consensus
The Idea of Public Reason Revisited
The Partisan Brain
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition
Climate change and right-wing populism in the United States
Between Facts and Norms
| Highly cited | No |
|---|