A “Fair Use” Exception for Public Health Uses of Medical Information
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20333202 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jessica Berg (0000-0003-2488-1685, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2013 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 13-14 |
| Publication date | 2013-05-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1002/hast.173 |
| PMID | 23650062 |
| OpenAlex | W1978678763 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 1 |
Should public health authorities have access to your personal medical information without your permission? The usual justifications for requiring informed consent do not necessarily apply. That is not to say that consent may be avoided in all situations, just that the reasons for requiring consent in public health are different than for traditional medical treatment
Alternative medicine · Family medicine · Health care · Health information · Informed consent · Internet privacy · Medical information · Permission · Political science · Public health · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2020 - 2021 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |