Conscience, Disobedience, and Standard of Care

In the article “Principled Conscientious Provision: Referral Symmetry and Its Implications for Protecting Secular Conscience,” Abram L. Brummett, Tanner Hafen, and Mark C. Navin reject what they call the “referral asymmetry” in U.S. conscientious objection law in medicine, which recognizes rights of conscientiously objecting physicians to withhold referrals for medical interventions but does not (yet) recognize rights of physicians to make referrals for medical interventions to which they are morally committed but to which their health care institutions are morally opposed. This commentary concentrates on a second asymmetry, namely, the relationship of a health care provider's referral or nonreferral to the medical standard of care. The commentary argues that this second asymmetry seems to require action more appropriately recognized as civil disobedience than conscientious provision of referral

Civil disobedience · Conscience · Conscientious objector · Family medicine · Health care · Political science · Psychological intervention · Referral · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Psychology · Torture, Ethics, and Law

• Principled Conscientious Provision

  Open Access•Abram Brummett, Abram L Brummett et al.•The Hastings Center Report•2024

  Add to list