Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Principled Conscientious Provision

Referral Symmetry and Its Implications for Protecting Secular Conscience

Bibliographic Data

ID20338136
AuthorsAbram Brummett (0000-0003-0511-574X), Abram L Brummett, Tanner Hafen, Mark C Navin (0000-0002-8511-6517)
Year2024
Volume54
Issue4
Pages3-10
Publication date2024-07-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Hastings Center Report (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0093-0334 • E-ISSN: 1552-146X
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/hast.4902
PMID39116174
OpenAlexW4401417527
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited20

“Conscientious provision” refers to situations in which clinicians wish to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments prohibited within their (usually Catholic) health care institutions. It mirrors “conscientious objection,” which refers to situations in which clinicians refuse to provide legal and professionally accepted treatments offered within their (usually secular) health care institutions. Conscientious provision is not protected by law, but conscientious objection is. In practice, this asymmetry privileges conservative religious or moral values (usually associated with objection) over secular moral values (usually associated with provision). In this article, we first argue for a legal right to one kind of conscientious provision: referral for procedures prohibited at Catholic hospitals. We then argue that a premise in that argument—the principle of comparably trivial institutional burdens— justifies legal protections for some additional forms of conscientious provision that include, for example, writing prescriptions for contraception or medical abortions. However, this principle cannot justify legal protections for other forms of conscientious provision, for instance, the right to perform surgical abortions or gender‐affirming hysterectomies at Catholic hospitals

Abortion · Argument (complex analysis) · Conscience · Conscientious objector · Epistemology · Family medicine · Health care · Political science · Premise · Referral · Sociology · Law · Medicine · Patient Dignity and Privacy · Philosophy · Reproductive Health and Contraception · Reproductive Health and Technologies

  • Conscience, Caricatures, and Catholic Identities

    Open Access•Cory D Mitchell•The Hastings Center Report•2024

  • Conscience, Disobedience, and Standard of Care

    Open Access•Stephen R Latham•The Hastings Center Report•2024

  • Active and Passive Euthanasia

    James Rachels•New England Journal of Medicine•1975

  • Delayed Access to Health Care

    Joel S Weissman, Robert Stern et al.•Annals of Internal Medicine•1991

  • The Reasonable Content of Conscience in Public Bioethics

    Open Access•Abram Brummett, Jason T Eberl et al.•Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare…•2025

  • Conscientious commitment, professional obligations and abortion provision after the reversal of Roe v Wade

    Open Access•Alberto Giubilini, Udo Schuklenk et al.•Journal of Medical Ethics•2024

  • The many metaphysical commitments of secular clinical ethics

    Open Access•Abram Brummett, Jason T Eberl•Bioethics•2022

  • Conscientious Objection in Health Care

    Open Access•Mark R Wicclair•Conscientious Objection in Health…•2011

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae