Student Evaluation of Teaching
The analysis of measurement invariance across online and paper-based administration procedures of the Romanian version of Marsh’s Student Evaluations of Educational Quality scale
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20349252 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel E Iancu (0000-0002-4980-5059, West University of Timişoara), Laurenţiu P Maricuțoiu (0000-0001-8358-3130, West University of Timişoara), Marian D Ilie (0000-0003-4807-5258, West University of Timişoara, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 81 |
| Pages | 101340 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Studies In Educational Evaluation (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0191-491X • E-ISSN: 1879-2529 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.stueduc.2024.101340 |
| OpenAlex | W4391797685 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 39 |
Student Evaluation of Teaching (SET) instruments can be administered online or with paper and pencil. These procedures involve different interactions between respondents and instruments which could cause errors when administrators and researchers want to compare or relate online results with paper-based results. This study aimed to analyze if the Romanian version of the Student Evaluations of Educational Quality instrument presents similar psychometric characteristics regardless if it is completed online or by paper and pencil. Data was collected from two groups of students (N = 809). One group completed the SEEQ on paper-pencil support (312 responders, 38.6%). The other group completed the scale for the same teachers and courses, but online and one year later. Psychometrical checks and measurement invariance analysis suggested that the Romanian version of SEEQ has passed the internal validity and reliability test and presented configural, metric, and scalar invariance across the results obtained from both administration procedures
Confirmatory factor analysis · Mathematics education · Measurement invariance · Romanian · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Engineering · Evaluation and Performance Assessment · Evaluation of Teaching Practices · Mathematics · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology
On the Validity of Student Evaluation of Teaching
Structural Equation Modeling With Amos, EQS, and Lisrel
Toward a Further Understanding of and Improvement in Measurement Invariance Methods and Procedures
Students' evaluations of University teaching
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling, Integrating CFA and EFA
Gender biases in student evaluations of teaching
A Review and Synthesis of the Measurement Invariance Literature
Evaluating Goodness-of-Fit Indexes for Testing Measurement Invariance
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Measurement Invariance, Factor Analysis and Factorial Invariance
A handbook of method in cultural anthropology.
A Monte Carlo Simulation Study on the Influence of Unequal Group Sizes on Parameter Estimation in Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis
Evaluation of university teaching as sound performance appraisal
Meta-analysis of faculty's teaching effectiveness
Instruments for obtaining student feedback
Online versus traditional teaching evaluation
The effect of switching to mandatory online course assessments on response rates and course ratings
Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in‐class and online surveys
Charting new territory
Student evaluations of teaching
Exploring graduate and undergraduate course evaluations administered on paper and online
Comparison of online and classroom-based student evaluations of instruction
Student evaluation of instruction
Critical comments on applying covariance structure modeling
The Use of Students’ Evaluations and an Individually Structured Intervention to Enhance University Teaching Effectiveness
Seeq
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
| Citations per year | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |