Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Forewarned is Forearmed? A Survey-Experiment concerning the Impact of Pre-Notification Letters on Response in a Postal Survey

Bibliographic Data

ID20386342
AuthorsBram Spruyt (0000-0003-0573-724X, Vrije Universiteit Brussel), Filip Van Droogenbroeck (0000-0003-1133-3495, Vrije Universiteit Brussel)
Year2014
Volume22
Issue2
Pages86-95
Publication date2014-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIrish Journal of Sociology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0791-6035 • E-ISSN: 2050-5280
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.7227/ijs.22.2.5
OpenAlexW2313912724
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited17

The use of pre-notification letters is thought to increase the response rate of postal surveys. The empirical evidence for that claim, however, is not conclusive. In this research note we assessed the impact of pre-notification by means of data from a large-scale survey-experiment conducted in Flanders (N: 4000). Three outcomes were studied: overall response rate, timing of the response and quality of the response. No significant positive impact was found on the overall response rate and quality of response. However evidence indicated that respondents who received a pre-notification letter were more inclined to respond earlier

Empirical evidence · Statistics · Survey data collection · Survey research · Applied Psychology · Census and Population Estimation · Healthcare Policy and Management · Mathematics · Psychology · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Examining Factors Impacting Online Survey Response Rates in Educational Research

    Open Access•Amany Saleh, Krishna Bista•Journal of MultiDisciplinary…•2017

  • Increasing response rates to postal questionnaires

    Open Access•Phil Edwards, Ian Roberts et al.•BMJ•2002

  • Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires

    Phil Edwards, Philip James Edwards et al.•Cochrane Database of Systematic…•2009

  • Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses

    Open Access•Julian P T Higgins, Simon G Thompson et al.•BMJ•2003

  • Mail and Internet Surveys

    Peter M Chisnall•Journal of Advertising Research•2007

  • National health surveys by mail or home interview

    H Susan J Picavet•Journal of Epidemiology and…•2001

  • Response Rate in Academic Studies-A Comparative Analysis

    Open Access•Yehuda Baruch•Human Relations•1999

  • Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research

    Open Access•Yehuda Baruch, Brooks C Holtom•Human Relations•2008

  • The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys

    Edith D De Leeuw, Mario Callegaro et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  • Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey

    Robert M Groves, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • Total Survey Error

    Robert M Groves, Lars Lyberg•Public Opinion Quarterly•2010

  • The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys

    Don A Dillman, D Dillman•Annual Review of Sociology•1991

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,11
Citation span2017 - 2017 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae