“Your friendly AI assistant”
The anthropomorphic self-representations of ChatGPT and its implications for imagining AI
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20397393 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Karin Van Es (0000-0001-5184-8640, Utrecht University, corresponding author), Dennis Nguyen (0000-0001-6982-775X, Utrecht University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 40 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 3591-3603 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | AI & Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0951-5666 • E-ISSN: 1435-5655 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s00146-024-02108-6 |
| OpenAlex | W4403844761 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 11 |
| References cited | 42 |
This study analyzes how ChatGPT portrays and describes itself, revealing misleading myths about AI technologies, specifically conversational agents based on large language models. This analysis allows for critical reflection on the potential harm these misconceptions may pose for public understanding of AI and related technologies. While previous research has explored AI discourses and representations more generally, few studies focus specifically on AI chatbots. To narrow this research gap, an experimental-qualitative investigation into auto-generated AI representations based on prompting was conducted. Over the course of a month, ChatGPT (both in its GPT-4 and GPT-4o models) was prompted to “Draw an image of yourself,” “Represent yourself visually,” and “Envision yourself visually.” The resulting data ( n = 50 images and 58 texts) was subjected to a critical exploratory visual semiotic analysis to identify recurring themes and tendencies in how ChatGPT is represented and characterized. Three themes emerged from the analysis: anthropomorphism, futuristic/futurism and (social)intelligence. Importantly, compared to broader AI imaginations, the findings emphasize ChatGPT as a friendly AI assistant. These results raise critical questions about trust in these systems, not only in terms of their capability to produce reliable information and handle personal data, but also in terms of human–computer relations
Art · Human–computer interaction · Performing arts · Visual arts · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Constructing AI power
Unpacking the dynamics of generative AI use in our daily lives
Microfoundations of rationality in the age of AI
There is no such thing as conscious artificial intelligence
The machine translator’s visibility
The pipeline exquis
‘Thinking’, ‘helping’, and ‘replacing’
Move fast and break people? Ethics, companion apps, and the case of Character.ai
Into the black box
AI agent, take over?! Task delegation to agentic AI systems in the Philippines
Speculative futures of artificial intelligence in education
Exciting red and competent blue
Imagining the thinking machine
ChatGPT Isn't Magic
The data subject and the myth of the ‘black box’ data communication and critical data literacy as a resistant practice to platform exploitation
Artificial intelligence in fiction
Minding the gap(s)
The news framing of artificial intelligence
The Smart Wife
Dreamscapes of Modernity
The Whiteness of AI
Images of Artificial Intelligence
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
National pride, global capital
Imagining big data
Finding AI Faces in the Moon and Armies in the Clouds
ChatGPT, LaMDA, and the Hype Around Communicative AI
Containing the Atom
Socio-technical futures and the governance of innovation processes—An introduction to the special issue
Deceitful Media
Life, but not as we know it
The rise of corporational determinism
Where exactly between utopia and dystopia? A framing analysis of AI and automation in US newspapers
The Handbook of Visual Analysis
Situating methods in the magic of Big Data and AI
Talking AI into Being
The social imaginaries of data activism
Reclaiming artificial intelligence accounts
Elites and socio-technical Imaginaries
| Unique citing works | 11 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 11 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |