Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Into the black box

Laypeople's folk theories about generative artificial intelligence chatbots

Bibliographic Data

ID19227915
AuthorsLi Z (0000-0002-6141-5184, Nanyang Technological University), Zhuoman Li (0009-0009-7149-6449, Nanyang Technological University), Nuri Kim (0000-0003-0004-0996, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, corresponding author), L Chen (0000-0002-8418-1288, Nanyang Technological University), Chen Lou (0000-0002-5506-5835, Nanyang Technological University)
Year2026
Volume13
Issue2
Publication date2026-05-10
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBig Data & Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2053-9517 • E-ISSN: 2053-9517
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/20539517261447838
OpenAlexW7160830950
LanguageEN
References cited61

This article explores laypeople's folk theories about generative artificial intelligence (GAI) chatbots and the ways in which these theories are constructed. As GAI tools like ChatGPT continue to expand in reach and capabilities, understanding public perceptions of these technologies is increasingly important. Drawing on folk theory as the conceptual framework, we analyze focus group discussions to gather qualitative insights into how users rationalize the mechanisms of GAI chatbots, with particular attention to the challenges of opacity and interpretability in these technologies. Findings reveal three primary areas within users’ folk theories: knowledge sources and mechanisms, perceived characteristics, and user expectations. We find that users construct these theories by interpreting terms like “machine learning,” directly engaging with chatbots to deduce meaning from these experiences, and drawing analogies to familiar objects. Ultimately, these folk theories shape the strategies users develop for interacting with GAI chatbots

Ambiguity · Construct (python library) · Focus (optics) · Generative grammar · Interpretability · Meaning (existential) · Perception · Representation (politics) · AI in Service Interactions · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

  • GPT-3

    Open Access•Luciano Floridi, Massimo Chiriatti•Minds and Machines•2020

  • ChatGPT

    Open Access•Partha Pratim Ray•Internet of Things and…•2023

  • The theory theory

    Open Access•Alison Gopnik, Henry M Wellman•Mapping the Mind•1994

  • Dimensions of Mind Perception

    Open Access•Heather M Gray, Kurt Gray et al.•Science•2007

  • First I "like" it, then I hide it

    Open Access•Motahhare Eslami, Karrie Karahalios et al.•Proceedings of the 2016 CHI…•2016

  • Algorithm appreciation

    Open Access•Jennifer M Logg, Julia A Minson et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2019

  • On seeing human

    Nicholas Epley, Adam Waytz et al.•Psychological Review•2007

  • Universal dimensions of social cognition

    Open Access•Susan T Fiske, Amy J C Cuddy et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2007

  • The Discovery of Grounded Theory

    Barney G Glaser, Anselm L Strauss•Discovery of Grounded Theory•2017

  • Why human–AI relationships need socioaffective alignment

    Open Access•Hannah Rose Kirk, Ingeborg Gabriel et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Building a Stronger Casa

    Open Access•Andrew Gambino, J Fox et al.•Human-Machine Communication•2020

  • How do people react to ChatGPT's unpredictable behavior? Anthropomorphism, uncanniness, and fear of AI

    Open Access•Amon Rapp, Chiara Di Lodovico et al.•International Journal of…•2025

  • Moral Uncanny Valley

    Open Access•Michael Laakasuo, Jussi Palomäki et al.•International Journal of Social…•2021

  • The algorithmic imaginary

    Taina Bucher•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • Microcoordination 2.0

    Open Access•Ruizhe Ling, Rich Ling et al.•Journal of Communication•2016

  • “Your friendly AI assistant”

    Open Access•Karin Van Es, Dennis Nguyen•AI & Society•2025

  • The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd edition)

    Open Access•David Wicks•Qualitative Research in…•2017

  • How do people react to AI failure? Automation bias, algorithmic aversion, and perceived controllability

    Open Access•M Jones-Jang, Yong Jin Park et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2022

  • Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists

    Arie Rip•Science as Culture•2006

  • Folk theories of algorithms

    Open Access•Brita Ytre-Arne, Hallvard Moe•Media Culture & Society•2021

  • A Pragmatic Definition of the Concept of Theoretical Saturation

    Jacqueline Low•Sociological Focus•2019

  • Deceitful Media

    Simone Natale•Deceitful Media•2021

  • Ascribing consciousness to artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Rose E Guingrich, Michael S A Graziano•Frontiers in Psychology•2024

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

  • Folk Theories of Journalism

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen•Journalism Studies•2016

  • Machines and Mindlessness

    Open Access•Clifford, Clifford Nass et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2000

  • A model of (often mixed) stereotype content

    Susan T Fiske, Amy J C Cuddy et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2002

  • Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify

    Open Access•Ignacio Siles, Andrés Segura-Castillo et al.•Big Data & Society•2020

  • Folk Theories of Online Dating

    Open Access•A Huang, Jeffrey T Hancock et al.•Social Media + Society•2022

  • Imagined Affordance

    Open Access•Peter Nagy, Gina Neff•Social Media + Society•2015

  • Concepts and Folk Theories

    A Gelman, Susan A Gelman et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2011

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae