Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Folk Theories of Nanotechnologists

Bibliographic Data

ID12206334
AuthorsArie Rip (University of Twente, corresponding author)
Year2006
Volume15
Issue4
Pages349-365
Publication date2006-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience as Culture (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0950-5431 • E-ISSN: 1470-1189
PublisherTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09505430601022676
OpenAlexW2069468067
LanguageEN
Citations received92
References cited24

The world of nanotechnology is full of folk theories. Actors attempt to capture patterns in what is happening and be reflexive about them, so as to do better the next time. A clear example is the diagnosis of an impasse in agro-food GM technologies, coupled to statements about the need to avoid such impasses with nanotechnology. Since there is a claim that such patterns will recur (if we don't change our ways), there is generalization, so one can speak of a theory—here about public reactions to new technology. Calling it a folk theory implies that it evolves in ongoing practices, and serves the purposes of the members of the various practices. In this example, these would be nanotechnologists, policy makers for nanotechnology, other scientists and technologists, science watchers and commentators. What characterizes folk theories is that they provide orientation for future action

Art history · Epistemology · Happening · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Chaos, Complexity, and Education · History · Nanotechnology research and applications · Philosophy · University-Industry-Government Innovation Models

  • Making responsibility matter

    Dani Shanley•2022

  • Unlocking participation

    Open Access•Daniela Fuchs•2024

  • Políticas Públicas de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação

    Open Access•Paulo Fonseca, Paulo F C Fonseca•Revista TOMO•2016

  • On the economics of techno-scientific promises

    Open Access•Pierre-Benoit Joly, Pierre Benoît Joly•Débordements•2010

  • Folk Theories of Journalism

    Rasmus Kleis Nielsen•Journalism Studies•2016

  • La anticipación en la búsqueda de una innovación responsable

    Open Access•Sergio Urueña•Recerca•2022

  • From ambition to implementation

    Open Access•Max Reichenbach, Torsten Fleischer•Energy Sustainability and Society•2023

  • ‘It’s All About Money’ – News Users’ Folk Theory of Audience Data Utilisation in Journalism

    Open Access•Liisa Ovaska•Digital Journalism•2025

  • From Industry Hype to Emerging Criticism

    Open Access•Matías Valderrama Barragán, Martin Tironi et al.•Digital Journalism•2026

  • The concept of ‘nature’ in chemistry in a digital and ecological age

    Open Access•Christian Schnurr•Foundations of Chemistry•2025

  • Evolving Collaborations

    Open Access•Norma Morris, Jeremy C Hebden•Science & Technology Studies•2008

  • Experiencing Political Advertising Through Social Media Logic

    Open Access•Martin Echeverría•Media and Communication•2023

  • If it is bad, why don’t I quit? Algorithmic recommendation use strategy from folk theories

    Open Access•Keyi Chen•Global Media and China•2024

  • Different ways of problematising biotechnology – and what it means for technology governance

    Open Access•Alexander Bogner, Helge Torgersen•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Science to the people! (and experimental politics)

    Open Access•Mathieu Quet•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Co-producing uncertainty in public science

    Open Access•Gwendolyn Blue, D J Davidson•Public Understanding of Science•2021

  • Co-creating Nano-imaginaries

    Open Access•Marian Deblonde, Michiel Van Oudheusden et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2008

  • Assessing Quality of Stakeholder Engagement

    Open Access•Yevgeniya Tomkiv, Astrid Liland et al.•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2017

  • Public Communication of Technological Change

    Open Access•Per Hetland•Nordic Journal of Science and…•2016

  • Into the black box

    Open Access•Li Z, Zhuoman Li et al.•Big Data & Society•2026

  • Lose One Another … and Find One Another in Nanospace. ‘Nanotechnologies for Tomorrow’s Society

    Open Access•Lieve Goorden, Michiel Van Oudheusden et al.•NanoEthics•2008

  • Have STS fallen into a political void? Depoliticisation and engagement in the case of nanotechnologies

    Open Access•François Thoreau, P Delvenne•Política & Sociedade•2012

  • Nano‐Industry Operationalizations of “Responsibility

    Open Access•Clare Shelley‐egan, Sarah R Davies•Review of Policy Research•2013

  • Curators of digital futures

    Open Access•Andreas Hepp•New Media & Society•2024

  • Boosting popularity

    Open Access•Guoning Zhao•Big Data & Society•2025

  • Technology Roadmaps, Innovation Journeys, and Nanoworld

    Open Access•Pavel Kotlík•Central European Journal of…•2018

  • Everything is Biased

    Open Access•Clara Juarez Miro•The International Journal of…•2023

  • Envisioning Ethical Nanotechnology

    Valerie L Hanson•Science as Culture•2010

  • No Longer Academic

    Daniel Patrick Thurs•Science as Culture•2007

  • The Construction of Imaginaries of the Public as a Threat to Synthetic Biology

    Claire Marris•Science as Culture•2014

  • The (Mis)understanding of Scientific Uncertainty? How Experts View Policy-Makers, the Media and Publics

    Catharina Landström, Richard Hauxwell‐Baldwin et al.•Science as Culture•2015

  • Expectations of Genomic Selection for Forestry

    Gwendolyn Blue, D J Davidson et al.•Science as Culture•2022

  • Lost in Translation? The Need for ‘Upstream Engagement’ with Nanotechnology on Trial

    Pierre-Benoit Joly, Pierre‐benoit Joly et al.•Science as Culture•2008

  • Collaboration Talk

    Elena Simakova•Science as Culture•2011

  • Responsibility and nanotechnology

    Open Access•Elise Mccarthy, C M Kelty et al.•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • Constructing failure in big biology

    Open Access•M Fukushima•Social Studies of Science•2015

  • The business of expectations

    Open Access•Neil Pollock, Robin Williams•Social Studies of Science•2010

  • Nano Scale [is] Magic Scale’

    Open Access•Nicolas Rasmussen, Declan Kuch•Social Studies of Science•2026

  • Caring for nanotechnology? Being an integrated social scientist

    Open Access•Ana Viseu•Social Studies of Science•2015

  • Unpacking news consumption and trust decisions through a folk theory approach

    Open Access•Diego Garusi, Clara Juarez Miro•Media Culture & Society•2024

  • The Ennobling Unity of Science and Technology”

    Open Access•Matthew N Eisler•Minerva•2013

  • Accounting for Impact? The Journal Impact Factor and the Making of Biomedical Research in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Alexander D Rushforth, Sarah De Rijcke•Minerva•2015

  • Definitions of artificial intelligence and quantum technologies

    Open Access•Biagio Aragona, Suania Acampa•Futures•2025

  • That would break the containment’

    Open Access•Ana Aparicio•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2021

  • Technology assessment as a myth buster

    Open Access•Helge Torgersen, Daniela Fuchs•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2017

  • Eclectic, random, intuitive? Technology assessment, RRI, and their use of history

    Open Access•Silke Zimmer-Merkle, Torsten Fleischer•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2017

  • The rise and fall of promises

    Open Access•Stefan Daniel Michel Gaillard, Sanda Hachana•Journal of Responsible Innovation•2025

  • Ayako Gotō 五島綾子, “Kagaku Būmu” No Kōzō

    Go Yoshizawa•East Asian Science Technology and…•2015

  • Resist or Comply

    Donghan Fu•Issues & Studies•2026

  • Envisioning futures

    Open Access•Regula Valérie Burri•European Journal of Futures…•2018

  • Folk theorizing the quality and credibility of health apps

    Open Access•Shaheen Kanthawala, Eunsin Joo et al.•Mobile Media & Communication•2018

  • Models of Public Engagement

    Open Access•Regula Valérie Burri•NanoEthics•2018

  • From Anti-Biotech to Nano-Watch

    Open Access•Franz Seifert, Alexandra Plows•NanoEthics•2014

  • Implicit Values in the Recent Carbon Nanotube Debate

    Open Access•Nicholas Surber, Rickard Arvidsson et al.•NanoEthics•2023

  • Context Matters

    Open Access•Haico te Kulve, Kornelia Konrad et al.•NanoEthics•2013

  • Nano-ethics as Nest-ethics

    Open Access•Tsjalling Swierstra, Arie Rip•NanoEthics•2007

  • Responsible Management in Private Sector Nano Enterprises

    Open Access•Vivian Weil•NanoEthics•2013

  • Textual Representation and Intertextuality of Graphene in Swedish Newspapers

    Open Access•Max Boholm•NanoEthics•2020

  • Bridging the Gap Between Innovation and Elsa

    Open Access•Arie Rip, Harro Van Lente•NanoEthics•2013

  • Responsibility through Anticipation? The ‘Future Talk’ and the Quest for Plausibility in the Governance of Emerging Technologies

    Open Access•Sergio Urueña•NanoEthics•2021

  • Beyond Implications and Applications

    Open Access•C M Kelty•NanoEthics•2009

  • Responsibility and Visioneering—Opening Pandora’s Box

    Open Access•Mary Sand•NanoEthics•2016

  • Meta-Regulation and Nanotechnologies

    Open Access•Bärbel R Dorbeck-Jung, Clare Shelley‐egan•NanoEthics•2013

  • Hype After Hype

    Open Access•Franz Seifert, Camilo Fautz•NanoEthics•2021

  • The Role of Professional Norms and Ethics in Security Mental Models

    Jennifer R Henrichsen, Valérie Bélair-Gagnon et al.•Journalism Practice•2025

  • Disappointment or hype? Framing artificial intelligence in the US elite news media

    Open Access•Lilla Vicsek, Katalin Feher et al.•Global Media and Communication•2026

  • All things weird and scary’

    Sarah R Davies, Matthew Kearnes et al.•Culture and Religion•2009

  • The Media Covers Up a Lot of Things”

    Ruth Palmer, Benjamin Toff et al.•Journalism Studies•2020

  • A future so close

    Open Access•T Liao, Andrew Iliadis•New Media & Society•2021

  • Social risk amplification as an attribution

    Jerry Busby, Dominic Duckett•Journal of Risk Research•2012

  • Knowledge transfer from citizens’ panels to regulatory bodies in the domain of nano-enabled medical applications

    Johan Evers, Joel D’Silva et al.•Innovation The European Journal…•2009

  • To track or not to track

    Open Access•Mykola Makhortykh, Aleksandra Urman et al.•Internet Research•2021

  • Enhancing innovation in agriculture at the policy level

    Open Access•Frank Vanclay, Frank M Vanclay et al.•Land Use Policy•2013

  • Scripting possible futures of nanotechnologies

    Open Access•Duncan den Boer, Arie Rip et al.•Technology in Society•2009

  • The governance of nanotechnology in the Brazilian context

    Paulo Fonseca, Paulo F C Fonseca et al.•Technology in Society•2014

  • Sci-fi Capital and Humanoid Robotics

    Open Access•Ana Alacovska•Sociology•2025

  • Tailoring Foresight to field specificities

    Open Access•Antoine Schoen, Totti Könnölä et al.•Futures•2011

  • (Re)making matter

    Open Access•Matthew Kearnes•Area•2007

  • The past and future of RRI

    Open Access•Arie Rip•Life Sciences Society and Policy•2014

  • Governance experiments in climate action

    Open Access•Kaisa Matscho, Kaisa Matschoss et al.•Environmental Politics•2018

  • Researching Technoscientific Concerns in the Making

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten•Environment and Planning A…•2010

  • Everyday Routines as Transformative Processes

    Open Access•J Hockey•Sociological Research Online•2019

  • Conversation-Related Advertising and Electronic Eavesdropping

    Open Access•Claire M Segijn, Joanna Strycharz et al.•Social Media + Society•2024

  • Science Communication Is Culture

    Open Access•Gwendolyn Blue•Science Communication•2019

  • Notions of Identity, Society, and Rhetoric in a Speech Code of Science Among Scientists and Engineers Working in Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Deborah R Bassett•Science Communication•2012

  • Engaging nanotechnologies

    Open Access•Phil Macnaghten•Ambiente & sociedade•2009

  • The American spirit

    Open Access•Emre Tarim, Arie Gozluklu et al.•Environment and Planning A…•2023

  • Folk theories of algorithmic recommendations on Spotify

    Open Access•Ignacio Siles, Andrés Segura-Castillo et al.•Big Data & Society•2020

  • "On "Aesthetic Publics

    Open Access•Mike Michael•Science Technology & Human Values•2018

  • Making Nano Matter

    Open Access•Elena Simakova•Science Technology & Human Values•2012

  • Shifting Expert Configurations and the Public Credibility of Science

    Open Access•Erwin Van Rijswoud•Science in Context•2014

  • Estamos ante un "giro poscompetitivo" en la política de ciencia, tecnología e innovación

    Open Access•Federico Vasen•Sociologias•2016

  • Genetic alchemy

    Sheldon Krimsky•Genetic alchemy•1982

  • Essays in the sociology of perception

    Mary Douglas•Essays in the sociology of…•1982

  • Folk biology and the anthropology of science

    Open Access•Atran, Scott Atran•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1998

  • The past and future of constructive technology assessment

    Open Access•Johan Schot, Arie Rip•Technological Forecasting and…•1997

  • Societal dimensions of nanotechnology

    Open Access•Michael E Gorman, James F Groves et al.•IEEE Technology and Society…•2004

  • Denialism

    Open Access•David M Berube, D Berube et al.•IEEE Technology and Society…•2004

  • Nanotechnology

    Open Access•Kristen Kulinowski, Kristen M Kulinowski•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2004

  • Inventing accuracy

    Donald Mackenzie, Donald A Mackenzie•Choice Reviews Online•1991

  • For an ethics of promising, or

    Open Access•Mike Fortun•New Genetics and Society•2005

  • Creating Public Alienation

    Brian Wynne•Science as Culture•2001

  • Scams Cannot Be Busted

    Open Access•Bernward Joerges•Social Studies of Science•1999

  • Do Artefacts Have Ambivalence

    Open Access•Steve Woolgar, Geoff Cooper•Social Studies of Science•1999

  • Real-time technology assessment

    Open Access•David H Guston, Daniel Sarewitz•Technology in Society•2002

  • Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things

    George Lakoff•Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things•1987

  • Do Politics Have Artefacts

    Open Access•Bernward Joerges•Social Studies of Science•1999

  • Culture in Action

    Ann Swidler•American Sociological Review•1986

Unique citing works92
Citations per year4,84
Citation span2007 - 2026 (20)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 89

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae