Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Distinguishing scientific knowledge

The impact of different measures of knowledge on genetically modified food attitudes

Bibliographic Data

ID20403123
AuthorsKathleen M Rose (0000-0003-2690-9848, corresponding author), Emily L Howell (0000-0001-6021-0235, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Leona Yi-Fan Su (0000-0002-8661-7196, University of Illinois at Urbana–Champaign, USA), Michael A Xenos (0000-0002-2604-172X, University of Wisconsin–Madison), Dominique Brossard (0000-0002-9188-8388), Dietram A Scheufele (0000-0002-9914-5407, University of Wisconsin–Madison, USA; Morgridge Institute for Research, USA)
Year2019
Volume28
Issue4
Pages449-467
Publication date2019-05-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePublic Understanding of Science (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-6625 • E-ISSN: 1361-6609
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/0963662518824837
PMID30764719
OpenAlexW2912716614
LanguageEN
Citations received21
References cited62

The impact of knowledge on public attitudes toward scientific issues remains unclear, due in part to ill-defined differences in how research designs conceptualize knowledge. Using genetically modified foods as a framework, we explore the impacts of perceived familiarity and factual knowledge, and the moderating roles of media attention and a food-specific attitudinal variable (food consciousness), in shaping these relationships. Based on the differential effects on “negative attitudes” toward genetically modified foods, we provide further evidence that the measures of knowledge are separate concepts and argue against a one-dimensional view of scientific knowledge. We discuss implications for understanding the relationship between knowledge and science attitudes

Biology · Genetically modified food · Genetically modified organism · Knowledge management · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Computer Science · Genetically Modified Organisms Research · Organic Food and Agriculture · Psychology · Genetics

  • The Use of Social Networking Sites and Pro-Environmental Behaviors

    Open Access•Zakir Shah, Lu Wei et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Examining Personal and Media Factors Associated with Attitude towards Genetically Modified Foods among University Students in Kunming, China

    Open Access•Li Li, John Robert Bautista•International Journal of…•2019

  • Exploring the relationships of citizens’ scientific interest and self-understanding to their learning enjoyment and self-efficacy in science

    Open Access•Ying‐yan Lu, Ying-Yan Lu et al.•Current Psychology•2023

  • Ecological Stimuli Predicting High School Students’ Genuine Interest in Socio-Scientific Issues

    Open Access•Brady Michael Jack, Zuway‐r Hong et al.•Science & Education•2024

  • Of Society, Nature, and Health

    Kathleen M Rose, Dominique Brossard et al.•Environmental Communication•2020

  • Propaganda persuasion, critical learning, and social recreation

    Open Access•Weiying Shi, Fei Shen et al.•Chinese Journal of Communication•2026

  • Beyond risk-benefit perceptions

    Open Access•Xing Zhang, Anfan Chen et al.•Chinese Journal of Communication•2026

  • Assessing public opinion about controversial risks

    Open Access•Brandon R Mcfadden, Jayson L Lusk et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2025

  • Factors influencing risk perceptions of genetically modified seafood

    J Stuart Carlton, Haley Hartenstine et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2024

  • Storytelling in Science Film

    Open Access•Emily L Howell, Shannon L Behrman et al.•Science Communication•2024

  • Bettering Biotech Foods’ Foul Flavor

    Open Access•Christoph Klimmt, Nico Spreen•Science Communication•2024

  • Uncomfortable trade-offs in plant protection – public perceptions of chemical and biotechnology options

    Open Access•Angela Bearth, A Fischer et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2026

  • Genome-edited versus genetically-modified tomatoes

    Open Access•Angela Bearth, Gülbanu Kaptan et al.•Agriculture and Human Values•2022

  • The state of GMOs on social media

    Open Access•Christopher D Wirz, Emily L Howell et al.•Politics and the Life Sciences•2020

  • Consumer willingness to pay for redundant food labels

    Open Access•Lacey Wilson, Jayson L Lusk•Food Policy•2020

  • Deference and decision-making in science and society

    Open Access•Emily L Howell, Christopher D Wirz et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2020

  • Ingredients of “a confusing cocktail”

    Open Access•Wenbo Li, Wen-Bo Li et al.•AI & Society•2026

  • Misconceptions Still Drive Citizens’ Scepticism Towards Biotechnologically Produced Food

    Open Access•Nico Spreen, Christoph Klimmt•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2024

  • Worse Than Ignorance

    Open Access•Peter J Schulz, Kent Nakamoto•Worse Than Ignorance•2024

  • I see a double-edged sword

    Open Access•M Chung, Nuri Kim et al.•New Media & Society•2026

  • How the Public Makes Sense of Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Sukyoung Choi, Chul-Joo Lee et al.•Science Communication•2025

  • Who Does the Public Trust? The Case of Genetically Modified Food in the United States

    Open Access•John T Lang, William K Hallman•Risk Analysis•2005

  • Validity of self-evaluation of ability

    P Alex Mabe, Paul A Mabe et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•1982

  • Public perceptions of agri-food applications of genetic modification – A systematic review and meta-analysis

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Ivo A Van Der Lans et al.•Trends in Food Science & Technology•2013

  • Communicating science in social settings

    Open Access•Dietram A Scheufele•Proceedings of the National…•2013

  • Who are organic food consumers? A compilation and review of why people purchase organic food

    Open Access•Renée Shaw Hughner, Pierre Mcdonagh et al.•Journal of Consumer Behaviour•2007

  • Worlds Apart? The Reception of Genetically Modified Foods in Europe and the U.S.

    Open Access•George Gaskell, Martin W Bauer et al.•Science•1999

  • Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings

    Open Access•Paul Slovic, Melissa L Finucane et al.•Risk Analysis•2004

  • Religiosity as a perceptual filter

    Open Access•Dominique Brossard, Dietram A Scheufele et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2009

  • Media attention to GM food cases

    Open Access•Steven M Flipse, Patricia Osseweijer•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Attitudes to genetically modified food over time

    Open Access•Mathew D Marques, Christine Critchley et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • How scary! An analysis of visual communication concerning genetically modified organisms in Italy

    Open Access•Vera Ventura, C de Miguel Sánchez et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2017

  • In science communication, why does the idea of a public deficit always return

    Open Access•Gitte Meyer•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • The lure of rationality

    Open Access•Molly Simis, Molly J Simis et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Misunderstanding Science

    Open Access•Alec Irwin, Helen Lambert et al.•Misunderstanding Science?•1996

  • The Association of Knowledge with Concern About Global Warming

    Open Access•Ariel Malka, Jon A Krosnick et al.•Risk Analysis•2009

  • Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  • Communicating about the Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Foods

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Joachim Scholderer et al.•Risk Analysis•2003

  • Science in Society

    Open Access•Patrick Sturgis, Nick Allum•Public Understanding of Science•2004

  • The Media and Genetically Modified Foods

    Open Access•Lynn J Frewer, Susan Miles et al.•Risk Analysis•2002

  • Science knowledge and attitudes across cultures

    Open Access•Nick Allum, Patrick Sturgis et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Public Opinion, Risk Assessment, and Biotechnology

    Open Access•Jerome S Legge, Robert F Durant•Review of Policy Research•2010

  • Do They Know What They Read? Building a Scientific Literacy Measurement Instrument Based on Science Media Coverage

    Open Access•Dominique Brossard, Jarrod Shanahan•Science Communication•2006

  • Deference to Scientific Authority Among a Low Information Public

    Dominique Brossard, Matthew C Nisbet•International Journal of Public…•2006

  • Effects of Value Predispositions, Mass Media Use, and Knowledge on Public Attitudes Toward Embryonic Stem Cell Research

    Shirley S Ho, Dominique Brossard et al.•International Journal of Public…•2008

  • Integrating the consumer interest in food safety

    Open Access•Ronald Macfarlane•Food Policy•2002

  • Consumer acceptance, valuation of and attitudes towards genetically modified food

    Open Access•Montserrat Costa-Font, José María Gil Roig et al.•Food Policy•2007

  • Factors influencing U.S. consumer support for genetic modification to prevent crop disease

    Katherine A Mccomas, John C Besley et al.•Appetite•2014

  • Messages promoting genetic modification of crops in the context of climate change

    Open Access•Hang Lu, Katherine A Mccomas et al.•Appetite•2017

  • Attitudes towards genetically modified and organic foods

    Open Access•Marieke Saher, Michael Lindeman et al.•Appetite•2006

  • Knowledge, attitudes towards and acceptability of genetic modification in Germany

    Open Access•Inken B Christoph, Maike Bruhn et al.•Appetite•2008

  • Beyond the knowledge deficit

    Open Access•Janus Hansen, Lotte Holm et al.•Appetite•2003

  • Consumer attitudes towards genetically modified foods

    Open Access•Maria Magnusson, Maria K Magnusson et al.•Appetite•2002

  • Food and values

    Open Access•Ellen Dreezens, Carolien Martijn et al.•Appetite•2005

  • Lifestyle segmentation of US food shoppers to examine organic and local food consumption

    Open Access•Cong Nie, Lydia Zepeda•Appetite•2011

  • Unskilled and unaware of it

    Justin Kruger, David Dunning•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions

    Open Access•David Turnbull•Futures•1997

  • Attitudes about Food and Food-Related Biotechnology

    Kristin K Runge, Kristin Runge et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2017

  • Inequalities in Scientific Understanding

    Open Access•Leona Yi-Fan Su, Michael A Cacciatore et al.•Science Communication•2014

  • Does Partisanship Shape Attitudes toward Science and Public Policy? The Case for Ideology and Religion

    Open Access•Joshua M Blank, Daron R Shaw et al.•The Annals of the American…•2015

  • Public Knowledge of and Attitudes to Science

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer, Kristina Petkova et al.•Science Technology & Human Values•2000

  • Gender and Young Voters in 2004

    Open Access•Mary Christine Banwart•American Behavioral Scientist•2007

Citations per year3
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae