Uniform Service, Uniform Productivity? Regional Efficiency of the Imperial German Postal, Telegraph, and Telephone Service
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20437667 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Florian Ploeckl (0000-0001-8500-9028, The University of Adelaide, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 221-243 |
| Publication date | 2016-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australian Economic History Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8992 • E-ISSN: 1467-8446 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/aehr.12099 |
| OpenAlex | W2253540034 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 12 |
Using the regional productivity of the Reichspost , the postal service of the German Empire, I investigate whether a public monopolist operates with uniform regional productivity. Using data envelopment analysis efficiency scores, we derive the relative productivity of the post, telegraph, and telephone sectors from 1891 to 1908. Results show a fairly stable system with substantial raw productivity differences between postal districts, and that the expansion of the service offset technological productivity increases for the mail service
Business · Data envelopment analysis · Economic growth · Economics · Geography · German · Industrial organization · Offset (computer science) · Political science · Post office · Postal service · Productivity · Service (business) · Statistics · Telecommunications · Computer Science · Efficiency Analysis Using DEA · Engineering · ICT Impact and Policies · Marketing · Mathematics · Public Administration · Transport and Economic Policies
The Z ollverein and the Sequence of a Customs Union
Uniform Service, Uniform Productivity? Regional Efficiency of the Imperial German Postal, Telegraph, and Telephone Service
Measuring and Improving Technical Efficiency in Uk Post Office Counters Using Data Envelopment Analysis
Market Access and Information Technology Adoption
The Consolidated Treaty Series (1648–1918)
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2016 - 2023 (8) |
| Highly cited | No |