On the lack of palatalization before –end- in the plural of Icelandic nominalized present participles such as Leikandi
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20438641 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Janez Orešnik (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1980 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 245-259 |
| Publication date | 1980-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-3922 • E-ISSN: 2350-420X |
| Publisher | University of Ljubljana (PUBLISHER • SI) |
| DOI | 10.4312/linguistica.20.1.245-259 |
| OpenAlex | W2105207879 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
This paper discusses the velar pronunciation of the root final segments in the plural of the Icelandic nominalized present participles, e.g. in leikend-, the plural of leikandi "actor". Since k(k)and g(g) are pronounced palatal before e in other old words(e.g. in akkeri "anchor"), the velar pronunciation of leikend- and similar words requires an expla nation. I see in the non-application of the palatalisation rule (while that rule operated before e; it is by no means certain that it still does) to leikend- and similar words the effect of Kiparsky's phonological universal ("Neutralization processes apply only to derived inputs") as modified in Orešnik 1979 (substrings crucially involving word-derivational morpheme boundaries are not derived inputs). Thus the /k+e/ of leikend- is not a derived input, and the palatal1sation rule, a neutralisation process, does not apply to it
Icelandic · Linguistics · Morpheme · Natural language processing · Phonological rule · Phonology · Plural · Pronunciation · Computer Science · History · Linguistics and language evolution · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|