Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Sacredness and Aesthetics

Kearney and Desmond on Prayer

Bibliographic Data

ID20458808
AuthorsDennis Vanden Auweele (0000-0001-9042-9086, Department of Philosophy Katholieke Universiteit Leuven Kardinaal Mercierplein 2 3000 Leuven BELGIUM, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume37
Issue1
Pages3-22
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueModern Theology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0266-7177 • E-ISSN: 1468-0025
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/moth.12589
OpenAlexW2994476687
LanguageEN

Heidegger famously asserted that one cannot pray to the God of onto‐theo‐logic. God is here made into a determinate concept, the highest idea of reason, and thereby loses its constitutive transcendence and personhood. To think of God appropriately after Heidegger means to think of God in a way amenable to prayer. It is widely recognized that deconstruction does not fare well on this score as it turns prayer into some form of meditation/contemplation. In response, one ought to look for something between onto‐theo‐logic and deconstruction. In this article, I explore and assess two attempts to do so, by Richard Kearney and William Desmond respectively. I argue that Kearney does not manage to escape the trap of deconstruction because he does not allow for an intimation of God in prayer. This is achieved in a more metaphysical register by Desmond

Contemplation · Epistemology · Meditation · Metaphysics · Prayer · Theology · Karl Barth and Christian Theology · Philosophy · Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism · Theology and Philosophy of Evil

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae