Ammianus Marcellinus, Peter de Jonge, and the Batavian Quadriga
The Interaction and Outcome
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20467005 |
|---|---|
| Authors | А С Козлов (0000-0002-9203-9169, Ural Federal University, Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 53 |
| Pages | 418–441 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Античная древность и средние века (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0320-4472 • E-ISSN: 2687-0398 |
| Publisher | Ural Federal University (PUBLISHER • RU) |
| DOI | 10.15826/adsv.2025.53.023 |
| OpenAlex | W7115164512 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 28 |
This article analyses the methods applied in the multi-volume philological and historical commentary on the text of the Res Gestae by Ammianus Marcellinus, the greatest historian of Late Antiquity. Started in 1935 by the Dutch Peter de Jonge and continued in the 1980s by a respected team of experts, the project was completed in 2018. It reflected, on the one hand, the growing dynamics of the quality of interpretations of the textual and historical empirics of the Res Gestae, and on the other hand, the shortcomings of Western European methods of narrow specialized commentary on the classical text. While making, as a rule, highly accurate and thorough analyses of the verbal and event-factual particulars of Ammianus’ passages, the researchers did not raise the problem of the conceptual and ideological integrity of the document and did not make a serious attempt to determine its place in the evolution of ancient historicism. The commentary realised the growing flow of research on the Res Gestae and its age in Western humanities, reflecting the main patterns of classical research in Europe and America at the turn of the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. At the same time, the contribution of the Dutch specialists to the study of both the textology of late antique historical prose and the analysis of historical empiricism presented by Ammianus should be highly valued. The applied significance of such a commentary is clearly long-term and will greatly contribute to the deepening of, first of all, source studies in the study of late Antiquity
Antique · Empiricism · Ideology · Philology · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classical Studies and Philology · Globalization, Historical Perspectives, and International Relations
Introduction
Ammianus Marcellinus’s Use of Exempla
The Dutch Ammianus Commentary Completed (on J. den Boeft, J. W. Drijvers, D. den Hengst, and H. C. Teitler, Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXXI)
Understanding Ammianus Marcellinus, Book by Book
Texts, Editors, and Readers
Literature, History, Periodization, and the Pleasures of the Latin Literary History of Late Antiquity
Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXVI
Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXX
Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXVII
Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXVIII
Philological and Historical Commentary on Ammianus Marcellinus XXXI
Coded Polemic in Ammianus Book 31 and the Date and Place of its Composition
Ambrose and Gratian
The Audience of Ammianus Marcellinus and the Circulation of Books in the Late Roman World
La Méthode d’Ammien Marcellin
Abusive Mouths in Classical Athens by Nancy Worman
Truth in Fiction
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |