Der terminus προνοητησ in der Byzantinischen verwaltung

The article examines on the basis of the small number of essential literary and sigillographic evidence the scope and duties of the ????????? (as a terminus technicus) in the Byzantine administration. The earliest evidence comes from the 6th century, the latest from the 12th. Already in the Early Byzantine period the scope of their activities is fixed: administration of domains and municipal and fiscal administration. Acting in the capacity of stewards of private and official real estate these people were responsible for collecting and transmitting taxes to the responsible department, minus an allowance for themselves. Their colleagues in the municipal and provincial administration were revenue officers with special authority. In the provincial administration of the 11th the pronoetai were sometimes also ?????????? in their region. Till now we know only one example of a commander of a thema who was at the same time also a ????????? (Eustathios Charsianites). The ????????? ??? ???????? (scil. fiscus) were authorized to exact outstanding taxes. A special case is the ????????? of the alms-house of Michael Attaleiates in Rhaidestos, because he was the highest administrator of all its estates and dependencies. Normally the ????????? were administrators of a lower rank in the domains, subject to the ????????? or the

Business · Economics · Estate · Law and economics · Library science · Management · Political science · Revenue · Sociology · Byzantine Studies and History · Computer Science · Historical and Religious Studies of Rome · Law · Public Administration · Finance

• St. George of Mangana, Maria Skleraina, and the "Malyj Sion" of Novgorod

  Open Access•Nicolas Oikonomides•Dumbarton Oaks Papers•1980

  Add to list