The Problem of Overextension
Analyzing America’s Black Sea Policies through Jentleson’s 4 Ps Framework
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 20495774 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Murat Ülgül (0000-0003-3846-8971, Karadeniz Technical University), Ismail Köse (0000-0002-8489-5088, Karadeniz Technical University) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Issue | Winter 2022 |
| Pages | 229-248 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-25 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Insight Turkey (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1302-177X • E-ISSN: 2564-7717 |
| Publisher | Insight Turkey/SETA Vakfi (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.25253/99.2022241.13 |
| OpenAlex | W4293087508 |
| Language | EN |
Historically, the U.S. strategy in the Black Sea region has been stable, limited, and not ambitious as American administrations prioritized certain foreign policy objectives over other interests. This careful strategy was transformed during the Clinton Administration in the mid-1990s as the U.S. started following an extensive foreign policy framework, which included all American national interests, formulated by Bruce Jentleson in his 4Ps framework: power, peace, prosperity, and principles. The article argues that this transformation was problematic because of two obstacles –the illusion of the unipolar moment and the growing polarization in American domestic politics– which prevented the U.S. from following an effective policy in the Black Sea region
Foreign policy · Illusion · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Prosperity · Sociology · Economic Sanctions and International Relations · Law · Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics · Public Administration · Russia and Soviet political economy
| Highly cited | No |
|---|