Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Necessity of Empirical Laws of Nature through the Lens of Kant’s Dialectic

Bibliographic Data

ID20510394
AuthorsLorenzo Spagnesi (0000-0003-2483-909X, Universität Trier, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume28
Issue3
Pages413-428
Publication date2023-09-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueKantian Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1369-4154 • E-ISSN: 2044-2394
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1369415423000274
OpenAlexW4386120748
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited20

This article analyses a sceptical challenge resulting from metaphysical approaches to the problem of the necessity of empirical laws of nature in Kant’s critical philosophy (what I shall call ‘essentialist’ readings). I argue that this challenge may jeopardize the purpose of empirical enquiry (and therefore the plausibility of essentialist readings), but that Kant has internal resources to address it in the Dialectic of the Critique of Pure Reason . I show that reading this problem through the lens of the Dialectic allows us to reconcile the metaphysical question of necessitation of laws with a robust sense of empirical cognition

Dialectic · Empirical evidence · Epistemology · Essentialism · Metaphysics · Skepticism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science

  • Kant’s Ongoing Relevance for Philosophy of Science

    Open Access•Andrew Jones, Andrew Cooper•Kantian Review•2023

  • Necessity for finite rational minds– Kant on empirical nomic necessity and the conceptual purposiveness of nature

    Open Access•Ido Geiger•Synthese•2025

  • Natures, ideas, and essentialism in Kant

    Open Access•Lorenzo Spagnesi•Synthese•2024

  • Kant’s regulative metaphysics of particular laws of nature

    Open Access•Noam Hoffer•Synthese•2025

  • Kant's Idealized Imputation of the Propensity to Evil in Religion Within the Boundaries of Mere Reason

    Open Access•Hui Yuan•Religions•2025

  • Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics

    Open Access•Marcus Willaschek•Kant on the Sources of Metaphysics•2018

  • Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Paul Guyer et al.•Critique of Pure Reason•1998

  • Lectures on Logic

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, J Michael Young•Lectures on Logic•1992

  • Lectures on Metaphysics

    Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Karl Ameriks et al.•Lectures on Metaphysics•1997

  • A rule‐based account of the regulative use of reason in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason

    Open Access•Lorenzo Spagnesi•European Journal of Philosophy•2023

  • The Systematic Unity of Reason and Empirical Truth in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason

    Lorenzo Spagnesi•Kant-Studien•2023

  • Kant on cognition and knowledge

    Open Access•Marcus Willaschek, Emma Watkins et al.•Synthese•2020

  • Rehabilitating the regulative use of reason

    Open Access•Michael Bennett Mcnulty•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2015

  • Kant on the Laws of Nature

    Open Access•James Kreines•European Journal of Philosophy•2008

  • The problem of grounding natural modality in Kant's account of empirical laws of nature

    Open Access•Kristina Engelhard•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2018

  • Hypotheses in Kant's philosophy of science

    Open Access•Andrew Cooper•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2022

  • Kant’s Modal Metaphysics

    Nicholas F Stang•Kant's Modal Metaphysics•2016

  • Prescribing laws to nature. Part I. Newton, the pre-Critical Kant, and three problems about the lawfulness of nature

    Michela Massimi•Kant-Studien•2014

Citations per year1.67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae