Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fieldwork in the Oligopoly

Protecting the Corporate Subject

Bibliographic Data

ID20669409
AuthorsD B Cornfield (0000-0002-2959-7264, Vanderbilt University), Daniel Cornfield, Teresa A Sullivan (The University of Texas at Austin), Teresa Sullivan
Year1983
Volume42
Issue3
Pages258-263
Publication date1983-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHuman Organization (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0018-7259 • E-ISSN: 1938-3517
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.17730/humo.42.3.e830005420u20746
OpenAlexW2015485307
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited16

Social scientists have discussed at length the protection of individual subjects but have paid little attention to collective subjects (for example, see Sjoberg 1967; Wax 1971; Diener and Crandall 1978). However, if researchers are to study the corporation and the corporate elite (Useem 1979), and if they are to bring the firm back into the mainstream of organizational research (Baron and Bielby 1980), they must also consider the protection of corporate research subjects. The need to protect collective subjects derives from the obligation to protect individual informants, but it also becomes a pragmatic issue in gaining access to study a large corporation. The common resort to pseudonyms is problematic, for the collective subject may be so distinctive that it can be identified in the first or subsequent studies (Vidich and Bensman 1958/59:4; Hicks 1977). The protection question applies specifically to qualitative fieldwork data, because methods for avoiding disclosure with quantitative data are already

Business · Criminology · Economics · Law and economics · Market economy · Oligopoly · Political science · Sociology · Subject (documents) · Computer Science · Management and Organizational Studies · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics

  • Working in 'High-Tech

    Open Access•Randy Hodson•Sociological Quarterly•1985

  • Internal labor markets and manpower analysis

    Peter B Doeringer•Internal labor markets and…•1985

  • Power and the Structure of Society

    James Samuel Coleman•Power and the Structure of Society•1980

  • Men and women of the corporation

    Rosabeth Moss Kanter•Men and women of the corporation•1977

  • Strategy and Structure

    Alfred D Chandler•Strategy and Structure•2013

  • Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy

    Alvin W Gouldner•Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy•1954

  • The Structure of American Industry

    Nathanael H Engle, Walter Adams•Journal of Marketing•1950

  • Ethical Principles in Anthropological Research

    Richard Newbold Adams, Richard Adams•Human Organization•1981

  • Working for Capitalism

    Philip Kraft, Richard M Pfeffer•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1982

  • Freedom and Responsibility in Research” Comments

    Arthur Vidich, Joseph Bensman•Human Organization•1958

  • Stratification in a Dual Economy

    E M Beck, Patrick M Horan et al.•American Sociological Review•1978

  • Freedom and Responsibility in Research

    Earl H Bell, Earl Bell et al.•Human Organization•1959

  • Bringing the Firms Back in

    James N Baron, William T Bielby•American Sociological Review•1980

  • On Fieldworkers and Those Exposed to Fieldwork

    Murray Wax, Murray L Wax•Human Organization•1977

  • Informant Anonymity and Scientific Accuracy

    George L Hicks, George Hicks•Human Organization•1977

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,02
Citation span1985 - 1985 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae