Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The often overlooked issue of statistical power

This and other issues regarding assessing importance weighting in quality of life measures

Datos Bibliográficos

ID2091817
AutoresChang‐ming Hsieh (0000-0002-5737-5757, University of Illinois Chicago, autor de correspondencia), Chang-Ming Hsieh
Año2015
Volumen50
Páginas303-310
Fecha de publicación2015-03-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSocial Science Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0049-089X • E-ISSN: 1096-0317
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.009
PMID25592938
OpenAlexW2077455782
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas9
Referencias citadas49

A-weighting · Econometrics · Null hypothesis · Quality (philosophy) · Statistical power · Statistics · Type I and type II errors · Weighting · Computer Science · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction · Psychology

  • Validity of Importance Weighting in Subjective Well-Being Research

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Qiguang Li•Journal of Applied Social Science•2020

  • Importance Weighting in Subjective Well-Being Measures

    Open Access•Akinori Kitsuki, Shunsuke Managi•Journal of Happiness Studies•2023

  • Use and misuse of Locke’s range-of-affect hypothesis in subjective well-being research

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•Quality & Quantity•2024

  • Importance Weighting in Client Satisfaction Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2017

  • A Client Satisfaction Measure of Homecare Services for Older Adults

    Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Journal of Social Service Research•2017

  • Subjective Well-being and Domain-specific Satisfaction

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•CAM•2026

  • Testing importance weighting

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•International Social Science…•2024

  • A Comparison of Normalized and Non-Normalized Multiplicative Subjective Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measurement

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Qiguang Li et al.•Social Indicators Research•2020

  • Importance of Health and Relative Importance of Satisfaction with One's Own Health

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2019

  • Top-Down Versus Bottom-Up Theories of Subjective Well-Being

    Open Access•Bruce Headey, Ruut Veenhoven et al.•Citation classics from 'Social…•2005

  • The principles of psychology.

    William James•1913

  • The Problem of Measurement Model Misspecification in Behavioral and Organizational Research and Some Recommended Solutions.

    Scott B Mackenzie, Scott Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Applied Psychology•2005

  • The Measurement of Life Satisfaction

    Bernice L Neugarten, R J Havighurst et al.•Journal of Gerontology•1961

  • Advancing formative measurement models

    Open Access•Adamantios Diamantopoulos, Petra Riefler et al.•Journal of Business Research•2008

  • The Satisfaction With Life Scale

    Ed Diener, Robert A Emmons et al.•Journal of Personality Assessment•1985

  • Validity Studies the Comprehensive Quality of Life Scale (Comqol)

    Open Access•Robert A Cummins, Matthew P Mccabe et al.•Educational and Psychological…•1994

  • Formative Measurement and Academic Research

    Open Access•Andrew Hardin, Andrew M Hardin et al.•Educational and Psychological…•2011

  • A Comparison Between Bottom–Up, Top–Down, and Bidirectional Models of Relationships Between Global and Life Facet Satisfaction

    Open Access•Charles E Lance, Gary J Lautenschlager et al.•Journal of Personality•1989

  • Measurement accuracy in assessing patient’s quality of life

    Open Access•Errol J Philip, Thomas V Merluzzi et al.•Quality of Life Research•2009

  • The Significance of Importance

    Open Access•Peter Hagell, ALBERT WESTERGREN•Quality of Life Research•2006

  • Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement

    Open Access•Tom Trauer, Andrew Mackinnon•Quality of Life Research•2001

  • A Critical Review of Construct Indicators and Measurement Model Misspecification in Marketing and Consumer Research

    Cheryl Burke Jarvis, Scott B Mackenzie et al.•Journal of Consumer Research•2003

  • Quality of Life Indexes for National Policy

    Open Access•Michael R Hagerty, Robert A Cummins et al.•Social Indicators Research•2001

  • Quality of Life in Older Persons

    Toni C Antonucci, L K George et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1981

  • Constructing Summary Indices of Quality of Life

    Open Access•Michael R Hagerty, K C Land•Sociological Methods & Research•2007

  • Building Weighted-Domain Composite Indices of Life Satisfaction with Data Envelopment Analysis

    Open Access•Jorge Guardiola, Andrés J Picazo-Tadeo•Social Indicators Research•2013

  • Integrating top-down and bottom-up structural models of subjective well-being

    Gregory J Feist, Todd E Bodner et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1995

  • The problem of analyzing multiplicative composites

    Martin G Evans, Martin Evans•American Psychologist•1991

  • Conventional wisdom on measurement

    K A Bollen, Kenneth Bollen et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1991

  • Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects

    Gary H Mcclelland, Charles M Judd•Psychological Bulletin•1993

  • Subjective well-being

    Ed Diener•Psychological Bulletin•1984

  • The Quality of American Life

    Robert Boguslaw, Angus Campbell et al.•Social Forces•1977

  • To Weight or not to Weight

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2004

  • Counting Importance

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2003

  • Issues in Evaluating Importance Weighting in Quality of Life Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2013

  • Should We Give Up Domain Importance Weighting in QoL Measures

    Open Access•Chang‐ming Hsieh, Chang-Ming Hsieh•Social Indicators Research•2012

  • Investigating Importance Weighting of Satisfaction Scores from a Formative Model with Partial Least Squares Analysis

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu et al.•Social Indicators Research•2009

  • Can We Weight Satisfaction Score with Importance Ranks Across Life Domains

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu•Social Indicators Research•2008

  • Examining the appropriateness of importance weighting on satisfaction score from range-of-affect hypothesis

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu•Social Indicators Research•2007

  • An Introduction to 'Benefit of the Doubt' Composite Indicators

    Open Access•Laurens Cherchye, Willem Moesen et al.•Social Indicators Research•2007

  • Do We Need to Weight Item Satisfaction by Item Importance? A Perspective from Locke's Range-Of-Affect Hypothesis

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu et al.•Social Indicators Research•2006

  • Do We Need to Weight Satisfaction Scores with Importance Ratings in Measuring Quality of Life

    Open Access•Chia-Huei Wu, Chia‐huei Wu et al.•Social Indicators Research•2006

  • Does Weighting Capture What's Important? Revisiting Subjective Importance Weighting with a Quality of Life Measure

    Open Access•Lara B Russell, Anita M Hubley et al.•Social Indicators Research•2006

  • Enhancing quality of life in the population at large

    Open Access•David R Evans•Social Indicators Research•1994

  • Causal direction in a model of life satisfaction

    Open Access•Anette Scherpenzeel, Willem E Saris et al.•Social Indicators Research•1996

  • Multiplicative and additive models of job and life satisfaction

    Open Access•A Mastekaasa•Social Indicators Research•1984

  • Top-down versus bottom-up theories of subjective well-being

    Open Access•Bruce Headey, Ruut Veenhoven et al.•Social Indicators Research•1991

  • The domains of life satisfaction

    Open Access•Robert A Cummins•Social Indicators Research•1996

Obras citantes distintas9
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2017 - 2026 (10)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 9
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae