Facilitating public scrutiny of EIA reports with open data and artificial intelligence
Insights from a Mexican case study
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21153776 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joaquín Giménez (0000-0001-9207-4792, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico), Tatiana Merino-Benítez (0000-0002-7587-1498, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico), Luis Tapia (0000-0001-6764-8803, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author), Fernando Esponda-Darlington (0000-0001-9602-8662, Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México), Tila M Pérez (Ciudad de México) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 354-365 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1461-5517 • E-ISSN: 1471-5465 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/14615517.2025.2534281 |
| OpenAlex | W4412830082 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 43 |
Public scrutiny is a cornerstone of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), yet their technical complexity methods often limits the ability of stakeholders to meaningfully review EIA reports. This paper introduces a practical approach that integrates Open Data (OD), Artificial Intelligence (AI), and comparative analysis of impact significance assessment to evaluate whether key sources of uncertainty are adequately addressed in EIA reports. We apply this approach to the case of the, focusing on a technical-scientific review of an EIA report of Tren Maya, commissioned by Mexican environmental authorities. We demonstrate how our approach can be employed to assess epistemic and ontological uncertainty in biodiversity impact assessments. This approach can identify weaknesses in expert judgments, data quality, and adherence to core EIA principles. Results indicate that the EIA report underestimated biodiversity impacts and exhibited methodological inconsistencies in indicator scoring and aggregation. In general, OD-AI tools supports evidence-based scrutiny under procedural constraints, while comparative analysis highlights the risks of biased or inconsistent judgments in conventional EIA practice. The approach is transparent, operationally accessible, and adaptable to other EIA domains and contexts
Data science · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Open data · Political science · Public participation · Scrutiny · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Environmental Science · Law · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Public Administration · Risk Perception and Management
On the Theory of Scales of Measurement
Open Science
Simultaneous conjoint measurement
The interminable issue of effectiveness
The contribution of capacities and context to EIA system performance and effectiveness in developing countries
Impact assessment for the 21st century – what future
Using an Artificial intelligence chatbot to critically review the scientific literature on the use of Artificial intelligence in Environmental Impact Assessment
AI will change EA practice – but are we ready for it? A call for discussion based on developments in collecting and processing biodiversity data
International lending and resource development in Mexico
Unveiling uncertainties to enhance sustainability transformations in infrastructure decision-making
Transformative effectiveness
A qualitative method proposal to improve environmental impact assessment
Analytic deliberation approach for collaborative determination of impact significance of projects in dispute, a case study in Mexico
Public participation in environmental impact assessment
Navigating expert judgment uncertainty in post-event environmental impact assessments for human-made disasters litigation
Incorporating scientific and traditional ecological knowledge into social impact assessment
Determination of significance in Ecological Impact Assessment
An approach for evaluating eias— deficiencies of eia in mexico
Can data science achieve the ideal of evidence-based decision-making in environmental regulation
Citizen Language and Administrative Response
Construct validity in psychological tests
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |