Reflective practice tools in ESL

Two retrospective evaluations

Bibliographic Data

ID21196378
AuthorsZüleyha Ünlü (0000-0002-9119-7042, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi, corresponding author), Erkan Kulekci (0000-0001-8486-230X, Kastamonu University)
Year2020
Volume11
Issue1
Pages109-127
Publication date2020-03-26
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueApplied Linguistics Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1868-6303 • E-ISSN: 1868-6311
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/applirev-2017-0075
OpenAlexW2885126221
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited23

This article evaluates the use of reflective practice (RP) tools by focusing on the main critiques on RP. In the literature, RP has often been criticised for its design-related problems, RP’s being directed by problem identification purposes rather than empirical data, and RP practitioners’ loss of contact with their discourse communities due to the undue emphasis on practical knowledge. Therefore, this article suggests methodological and data triangulation of RP tools as well as highlighting the community of inquiry framework to overcome the aforementioned problems While doing this, the authors reflect on their own RPs, both of which were conducted at a refugee centre in Philadelphia, USA. In this examination, the critical role of reflective tools is highlighted

Empirical research · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Geography · Pedagogy · Political science · Reflective Practice · Refugee · Sociology · Triangulation · Engineering · Law · Online and Blended Learning · Psychology · Reflective Practices in Education · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub