Input and age effects
Quo vadis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21201397 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fred Weerman (0000-0001-8732-8524, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 381-386 |
| Publication date | 2014-08-12 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1879-9264 • E-ISSN: 1879-9272 |
| Publisher | John Benjamins Publishing Company (PUBLISHER • NL) |
| DOI | 10.1075/lab.4.3.15wee |
| OpenAlex | W2003166714 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 9 |
The article discusses the important role played input in language acquisition. Topics include the difficulty in obtaining the difference between groups and languages, the visibility of the success of children concerning inflection in their knowledge, and the description of lexical mistake for monolinguals
Political science · Status quo · Status quo bias · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Computer Science · Law · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Reading and Literacy Development
Second Language Acquisition and Universal Grammar
Pidgins and Creoles
Early, late or very late
Second Language Acquisition in Early Childhood
Prosodic structure and syntactic acquisition
Articles, adjectives and age of onset
Missing Surface Inflection or Impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement
Very early parameter setting and the unique checking constraint
Dummy auxiliaries in child and adult second language acquisition of Dutch
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2019 - 2019 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |