Question sequences in English TED Talks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21226809 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michele Cardo (Université Paris Cité), Agnès Celle (0000-0002-7604-2659, Université Paris Cité) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | s2 |
| Pages | 171-180 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics Vanguard (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2199-174X • E-ISSN: 2199-174X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/lingvan-2025-0027 |
| OpenAlex | W4410834660 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 27 |
Questions are used across discourse settings for a variety of purposes. The meaning and use of questions has been extensively studied in discourse types which feature multiple conversation participants. However, much research remains to be conducted on the function of questions in discourse settings which feature one main speaker, such as TED Talks. The current study is an attempt to fill that gap. We examine a corpus of 18 English TED Talks to understand how sequential questions fit into the larger discursive context of presentational speech. We argue that question sequences are used by TED speakers primarily to evoke salience and simulate interaction between the speaker and addressee. The salient use of question sequences reflects a level of monologue which is inherent in TED Talks due to the single-speaker presentational format. Concurrently, the interactive potential created by question sequences indicates that TED Talks contain some level of dialogue. Therefore, the analysis of salient and interactive question sequences calls into question the discourse classification of TED Talks along monologic–dialogic lines. Rather than prescribe a strict monologic classification of TED Talks, we argue that TED Talks should be considered to be in a discourse category which incorporates elements of dialogue in monologue
Linguistics · Mathematics education · Computer Science · Digital Communication and Language · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Philosophy · Psychology
Pragmatic Markers in English
The stance triangle
The Semantics of Evidentials in Questions
Non-Intrusive Questions as a Special Type of Non-Canonical Questions
Questions in the TED-Multilingual Discourse Bank and the development of an annotation scheme
Questions in monological discourse in the Estonian parliament
The argumentative functions of strategic questions in Portuguese parliamentary speeches
Question sequences in English TED Talks
Identifying and describing functional discourse units in the BNC Spoken 2014
D&S Forum
Discourse and Text
Evaluating an Expectation-Driven Question-Under-Discussion Model of Discourse Interpretation
Listeners as co-narrators
Stance and engagement
Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation During Storytelling
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
Public Speaking and the New Oratory
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |