Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Egophoricity, Involvement, and Semantic Roles in Tibeto-Burman Languages

Bibliographic Data

ID21239830
AuthorsManuel Widmer (University of Zurich, corresponding author), Federico Zúñiga (0000-0002-9015-6601, University of Bern), Fernando Zúñiga
Year2017
Volume3
Issue1
Publication date2017-10-26
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueOpen Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2300-9969 • E-ISSN: 2300-9969
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/opli-2017-0021
OpenAlexW2767555432
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited4

In this study, we explore typological aspects of egophoricity marking based on selected Tibeto- Burman languages. Conceptualizing egophoricity as an autonomous grammatical category that marks access to knowledge, we first discuss how egophoricity marking interacts with evidentiality in the Tibeto-Burman languages Shigatse Tibetan and Bunan. We then go on to explore the differences between the egophoricity systems of Shigatse Tibetan and Bunan, arguing that the variability of egophoricity within and across languages can be captured if we distinguish (i) constructions in which egophoricity markers express privileged access to knowledge due to actional involvement in the role of an event participant from (ii) constructions in which egophoricity markers express privileged access to knowledge due to epistemic involvement in the role of a “knower” whose precise relation to the event is not specified. We additionally introduce a set of five semantic roles to offer a more detailed description of the egophoricity systems of Shigatse Tibetan and Bunan (and also, albeit marginally, Kathmandu Newar and Galo). This study thus offers a new perspective on the variability of egophoricity systems in Tibeto-Burman and propagates an analytical approach that may also be helpful for analyzing egophoricity systems in other language families of the world

Evidentiality · Linguistics · Computer Science · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Philosophy · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation · Artificial Intelligence

  • Egophoric marking in a sinitic language

    Open Access•Na Song•Journal of Pragmatics•2019

  • Copulas in Brokpa

    Open Access•Damian Funk•Himalayan Linguistics•2020

  • Beyond “to be”

    Open Access•Junwei Bai•Folia Linguistica•2026

  • Doing things with grammar

    Open Access•Maria Khachaturyan, Erika Sandman et al.•Functions of Language•2024

  • Vietnamese expletive between grammatical subject and subjectivity marker

    Huy Linh Dao•Studies at the Grammar-Discourse…•2021

  • Egophoricity in Central Stau copular clauses

    Open Access•Sami Honkasalo•Bulletin of the School of…•2025

  • Territory of Information

    Akio Kamio•Territory of Information•1997

  • The epistemization of person markers in reported speech

    Manuel Widmer, Marius Zemp•Studies in Language•2017

  • Ergativity and the cognitive model of event structure in Lhasa Tibetan

    Open Access•Scott Delancey•Cognitive Linguistics•1990

  • Epistemics in Action

    J Heritage•Research on Language and Social…•2012

Citations per year0.86
Citation span2019 - 2026 (8)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae