Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Comparative Study of Reporting Verbs Used in the Introduction Chapters of Bachelor’s Theses and Master’s Theses by Chinese English-Majored Students

Bibliographic Data

ID21240634
AuthorsShuangqing Wen (0000-0001-5748-960X, Suranaree University of Technology), Issra Pramoolsook (0000-0001-9836-3819, Suranaree University of Technology)
Year2021
Volume11
Issue2
Publication date2021-09-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueIndonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2301-9468 • E-ISSN: 2502-6747
PublisherUniversitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.17509/ijal.v11i2.32748
OpenAlexW3201752150
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

Reporting verbs (RVs), as rhetorical lexical devices, play a key role in academic writing because they enable writers to attribute content to other sources and allow them to convey both the kind of activities reported and their evaluation of the reported information. However, no study has been conducted on how RVs are used differently between bachelor’s theses (BTs) and master’s theses (MTs) in the Chinese context. Through corpus-based and comparative analysis, this study, therefore, aims to analyze and compare the use of RVs between 30 BT Introduction Chapters and 30 MT Introduction Chapters by Chinese English-majored students in terms of denotative potentials and evaluative functions based on Hyland’s (2002) classification framework. The results reveal that RVs used by undergraduate students are smaller in amount and narrower in range compared with those used by master’s students. Concerning the denotative potentials of RVs, a similar distribution of RVs was found in the two corpora. Both undergraduate and master’s students prefer Discourse Act RVs and Research Act RVs to Cognition Act RVs. Regarding their evaluative functions, undergraduate students show a tendency toward non-factive RVs, while master’s students tend to use factive RVs. These findings provide a valuable view of how Chinese English-majored students use RVs in their thesis writing, but their knowledge of the rhetorical functions of this device is still insufficient. The findings might increase thesis writers’ knowledge on the significance of RVs and raise their awareness of using RVs appropriately and effectively in their thesis writing, or even in all kinds of academic discourse. This paper then provides some suggestions for thesis writing courses

Bachelor · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Rhetorical question · Sociology · Discourse Analysis in Language Studies · History · Law · Philosophy · Psychology · Second Language Acquisition and Learning

  • Postgraduate Students’ Use of Reporting Verbs in Literature Review Writings

    Open Access•Geok Imm Lee, Helen Tan•GEMA Online Journal of Language…•2023

  • Disciplinary discourses

    Ken Hyland•Disciplinary discourses•2000

  • Academic attribution

    K Hyland•Applied Linguistics•1999

  • Evaluation in the Reporting Verbs Used in Academic Papers

    Graham Thompson, Y YIYUN et al.•Applied Linguistics•1991

  • Rhetorical Structure of Integrated Results and Discussion Chapter in Master’s Dissertations Across Disciplines

    Open Access•Zahra Shirian Dastjerdi, Helen Tan et al.•Discourse and Interaction•2017

  • Focused Group Interviews as an Innovative Quanti- Qualitative Methodology (QQM )

    Open Access•Brian J Grim, Brian Grim et al.•Qualitative Report•2015

  • Academic attribution

    Open Access•Alireza Jalilifar•International Journal of Applied…•2012

  • Genre Analysis

    Ingrid Pufahl, John M Swales•Language•1993

Citations per year0.33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae