On a productive dialogue between religion and science
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21244815 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Enn Kasak (0000-0002-7185-2660, University of Tartu), Anne Kull (0000-0001-5876-532X, University of Tartu) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 129 |
| Publication date | 2018-04-24 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Scientia et Fides (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2353-5636 • E-ISSN: 2300-7648 |
| Publisher | Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika/Nicolaus Copernicus University (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.12775/setf.2018.009 |
| OpenAlex | W2803362350 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
Searching for common ground in philosophy, science and theology, it seems to us that it would be reasonable to maintain the position of realistic pragmatism that Charles Sanders Peirce had called pragmaticism. In the pragmaticist manner, we typify the knowledge and select the types of knowledge that might be useful for understanding the problems that are of interest to us.We pose a question of how it would be possible to obtain practically useful information about reality, first from the perspective of natural sciences, and then from that of theology; that is, to diversify the ways of knowledge and just maybe, to move toward a productive dialogue between science and religion
Common ground · Epistemology · Natural science · Pragmatism · Sociology · Computer Science · Evolution and Science Education · Philosophy · Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education · Study and Philosophy of Religion · Artificial Intelligence
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |