Transforming role classification in scientific teams using LLMs and advanced predictive analytics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21255736 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Wonduk Seo (0009-0008-6070-1833, Peking University), Yi Bu (0000-0003-1737-3252, Peking University) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Pages | 505-523 |
| Publication date | 2025-05-12 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Quantitative Science Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2641-3337 • E-ISSN: 2641-3337 |
| Publisher | MIT Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1162/qss_a_00360 |
| OpenAlex | W4408868576 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
Scientific team dynamics are critical in determining the nature and impact of research outputs. However, existing methods for classifying author roles based on self-reports and clustering lack comprehensive contextual analysis of contributions. Thus, we present a transformative approach to classifying author roles in scientific teams using advanced large language models (LLMs), which offers a more refined analysis compared to traditional clustering methods. Specifically, we seek to complement and enhance these traditional methods by utilizing open source and proprietary LLMs, such as GPT-4, Llama3 70B, Llama2 70B, and Mistral 7x8B, for role classification. Utilizing few-shot prompting, we categorize author roles and demonstrate that GPT-4 outperforms other models across multiple categories, surpassing traditional approaches such as XGBoost and BERT. Our methodology also includes building a predictive deep learning model using 10 features. By training this model on a data set derived from the OpenAlex database, which provides detailed metadata on academic publications—such as author-publication history, author affiliation, research topics, and citation counts—we achieve an F1 score of 0.76, demonstrating robust classification of author roles
Analytics · Data science · Predictive analytics · Big Data and Business Intelligence · Computer Science · Psychology
Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups
Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology
Co‐citation analysis, bibliographic coupling, and direct citation
A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms
A new methodology for constructing a publication‐level classification system of science
Atypical Combinations and Scientific Impact
What is research collaboration?
Studying research collaboration using co-authorships
ChatGPT outperforms crowd workers for text-annotation tasks
The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
A method for identifying different types of university research teams
Collaborative Research Across Disciplinary and Organizational Boundaries
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |