Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A method for identifying different types of university research teams

Bibliographic Data

ID22230581
AuthorsZhe Cheng (0000-0002-7332-604X, Central China Normal University), Yihuan Zou (0009-0007-5417-1592, Central China Normal University), Yueyang Zheng (0000-0001-7751-2619, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume11
Issue1
Publication date2024-04-18
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHumanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1057/s41599-024-03014-4
OpenAlexW4394924033
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited31

Identifying research teams constitutes a fundamental step in team science research, and universities harbor diverse types of such teams. This study introduces a method and proposes algorithms for team identification, encompassing the project-based research team (Pbrt), the individual-based research team (Ibrt), the backbone-based research group (Bbrg), and the representative research group (Rrg), scrutinizing aspects such as project, contribution, collaboration, and similarity. Drawing on two top universities in Materials Science and Engineering as case studies, this research reveals that university research teams predominantly manifest as backbone-based research groups. The distribution of members within these groups adheres to Price’s Law, indicating a concentration of research funding among a minority of research groups. Furthermore, the representative research groups in universities exhibit interdisciplinary characteristics. Notably, significant differences exist in collaboration mode and member structures among high-level backbone-based research groups across diverse cultural backgrounds

Data science · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Computer Science · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research

  • Rethinking Knowledge Production in University Research Teams

    Open Access•Zhe Cheng, Xuan Liu et al.•European Journal of Education•2026

  • Transforming role classification in scientific teams using LLMs and advanced predictive analytics

    Open Access•Wonduk Seo, Yi Bu•Quantitative Science Studies•2025

  • Starting points for navigating the maze of SDG interactions

    Open Access•Yizhong Huan, Lan Yang et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2026

  • Social Network Analysis

    John G Scott, John Scott•Social Network Analysis•2017

  • Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology

    Open Access•Lingfei Wu, Dashun Wang et al.•Nature•2019

  • The Science of Team Science

    Open Access•Daniel Stokols, Kara L Hall et al.•American Journal of Preventive…•2008

  • Fast unfolding of communities in large networks

    Open Access•Vincent D Blondel, Jean-Loup Guillaume et al.•Journal of Statistical Mechanics:…•2008

  • The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science

    Open Access•Patrick S Forscher, Eric-Jan Wagenmakers et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2023

  • Reflections on and a short review of the science of team science

    Open Access•Yuxian Liu, Yishan Wu et al.•Scientometrics•2020

  • Concentration or dispersal of research funding

    Open Access•Kaare Aagaard, Alexander Kladakis et al.•Quantitative Science Studies•2020

  • A graph-theoretic generalization of the clique concept

    Stephen B Seidman, B L Foster•Journal of Mathematical Sociology•1978

Unique citing works3
Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae