A method for identifying different types of university research teams
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 22230581 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Zhe Cheng (0000-0002-7332-604X, Central China Normal University), Yihuan Zou (0009-0007-5417-1592, Central China Normal University), Yueyang Zheng (0000-0001-7751-2619, Chinese University of Hong Kong, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Humanities and Social Sciences Communications (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2662-9992 • E-ISSN: 2662-9992 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1057/s41599-024-03014-4 |
| OpenAlex | W4394924033 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 31 |
Identifying research teams constitutes a fundamental step in team science research, and universities harbor diverse types of such teams. This study introduces a method and proposes algorithms for team identification, encompassing the project-based research team (Pbrt), the individual-based research team (Ibrt), the backbone-based research group (Bbrg), and the representative research group (Rrg), scrutinizing aspects such as project, contribution, collaboration, and similarity. Drawing on two top universities in Materials Science and Engineering as case studies, this research reveals that university research teams predominantly manifest as backbone-based research groups. The distribution of members within these groups adheres to Price’s Law, indicating a concentration of research funding among a minority of research groups. Furthermore, the representative research groups in universities exhibit interdisciplinary characteristics. Notably, significant differences exist in collaboration mode and member structures among high-level backbone-based research groups across diverse cultural backgrounds
Data science · Biomedical and Engineering Education · Computer Science · Interdisciplinary Research and Collaboration · scientometrics and bibliometrics research
Social Network Analysis
Large teams develop and small teams disrupt science and technology
The Science of Team Science
Fast unfolding of communities in large networks
The Benefits, Barriers, and Risks of Big-Team Science
Reflections on and a short review of the science of team science
Concentration or dispersal of research funding
A graph-theoretic generalization of the clique concept
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |