A gender equality paradox in academic publishing

Countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored journal articles have larger first-author gender disparities between fields

Bibliographic Data

ID21255893
AuthorsMike Thelwall (0000-0001-6065-205X, University of Wolverhampton), Amalia Mas-Bleda (0000-0001-5927-424X, University of Wolverhampton)
Year2020
Volume1
Issue3
Pages1260-1282
Publication date2020-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueQuantitative Science Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2641-3337 • E-ISSN: 2641-3337
PublisherMIT Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1162/qss_a_00050
OpenAlexW3018807327
LanguageEN
Citations received8
References cited60

Current attempts to address the shortfall of female researchers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) have not yet succeeded, despite other academic subjects having female majorities. This article investigates the extent to which gender disparities are subject-wide or nation-specific by a first-author gender comparison of 30 million articles from all 27 Scopus broad fields within the 31 countries with the most Scopus-indexed articles 2014–2018. The results show overall and geocultural patterns as well as individual national differences. Almost half of the subjects were always more male (seven; e.g., Mathematics) or always more female (six; e.g., Immunology & Microbiology) than the national average. A strong overall trend (Spearman correlation 0.546) is for countries with a higher proportion of female first-authored research to also have larger differences in gender disparities between fields (correlation 0.314 for gender ratios). This confirms the international gender equality paradox previously found for degree subject choices: Increased gender equality overall associates with moderately greater gender differentiation between subjects. This is consistent with previous United States-based claims that gender differences in academic careers are partly due to (socially constrained) gender differences in personal preferences. Radical solutions may therefore be needed for some STEM subjects to overcome gender disparities

Demographic economics · Economics · Gender bias · Gender disparity · Gender equality · Library science · MEDLINE · Political science · Publishing · Scopus · Sociology · Career Development and Diversity · Demography · Diversity and Career in Medicine · Gender Studies · Law · Psychology · scientometrics and bibliometrics research · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access