Ethical Implications of the Authoritarian Personality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21259871 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter E Mudrack (0000-0002-9053-0456, Kansas State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 1038-1051 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2694-6416 • E-ISSN: 2694-6424 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/beer.12826 |
| OpenAlex | W4410197102 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 129 |
Although authority relationships are obviously ubiquitous in organizations, management scholars have, curiously, contributed little to the substantial body of research into the authoritarian personality. Moreover, an observed large‐magnitude negative relationship between authoritarianism and ethical relativism, first reported over a quarter century ago, has made almost no meaningful impact on our conceptions of either construct. Perhaps as a consequence, some business ethics researchers have gravitated toward demonstrably inaccurate interpretations of relativism. From these starting points, this paper makes the case that an understanding of the authoritarian personality, with its grounding in low relativism, may provide otherwise unavailable insights into business ethics. Past research reveals that high authoritarians readily comply with authority figures that advocate ethically questionable actions, prioritize the needs of business over concern for the natural environment, appear to lack personal initiative at work, display hostile and aggressive tendencies, and often view diverse others negatively. Awareness of such findings may expand research horizons to include the possibility that highly authoritarian employees might, for example, regard organizational attempts to increase diversity or ‘go green’ as anathema, want no part of participation in decision making, and feel totally justified when engaging in bullying behaviors at work. Managers wanting intelligent and creative employees able both to think for themselves and take initiative, and employees who lack preconceived notions of inferiority about diverse others that has to be overcome when interacting with them at work, should consider hiring persons who are low in authoritarianism
Authoritarianism · Democracy · Personality · Political science · Politics · Law · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
The march of modern fascism. A comparison of social dominance orientation and authoritarianism
False Equivalence
The Association of Cognitive Ability with Right–Wing Ideological Attitudes and Prejudice
Toward a Unifying Model of Identification With Groups
The Relationship between the Brexit Vote and Individual Predictors of Prejudice
Generating Theory by Abduction
Authoritarianism and Attitudes toward Contemporary Social Issues
Cognitive ability and authoritarianism
Side Effects of Multiculturalism
The authoritarian personality
Conservatives' Approach to Work
Cyberbullying and its relation to right and left authoritarianism, trait victimhood, and mental illness
Do bad apples do good deeds? The role of morality
Justifying ethical values
Subcomponents of Right-Wing Authoritarianism Differentially Predict Attitudes Toward Obeying Authorities
Reanalysis within a Christian Ideological Surround
The Other “Authoritarian Personality”
Hiding in plain view
Does Ideology Transcend Culture? A Preliminary Examination in Romania
Gender, Sexuality, and the Authoritarian Personality
The connections between personality, ideology and (counter‐)empathic emotions depend on the target
A meta-analytic integration of research on the relationship between right-wing ideological attitudes and aggressive tendencies
Ethical Beliefs and Tolerance of Ambiguity
Religious Fundamentalism, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Prejudice
A Scale for Measuring Students' Anti-Intellectualism
Religious Fundamentalism, Right-Wing Authoritarianism and Prejudice
Attachment, Competitiveness, and Workplace Aggression
Construct Validity of the Attitudes about Reality Scale
The effects of communicating climate change threat
A model of work frustration-aggression
Social Dominance Orientation, Right-Wing Authoritarianism, Sexism, and Prejudice Toward Women in the Workforce
The personality bases of socio-political attitudes
The intergenerational transmission of racism
Escape from Freedom”
Identification With All Humanity
Motivational underpinnings of social influence in work settings
The role of intergroup disgust in predicting negative outgroup evaluations
Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and Other Roots of Generalized Prejudice
Childhood Punishment, Denial, and Political Attitudes
Authoritarianism and Political Impoverishment
Authoritarianism, Anger, and Hostile Attribution Bias
Perceived grievance and individualising moralities
Clarifying the structure and nature of left-wing authoritarianism
Morality beyond the Weird
Authoritarian dynamics and unethical decision making
A taxonomy of ethical ideologies
Isms and the structure of social attitudes
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition
Reasoning as a Predictor of Attitudes Toward Gay Men
The Role of Parental Religious Fundamentalism and Right-Wing Authoritarianism in Child-Rearing Goals and Practices
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |