Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How government AI employees shape public participation perception

Evidence from “Shen Xiao-i” in Shenzhen

Bibliographic Data

ID21282370
AuthorsXiaodi Jiang (0000-0003-1392-3456, Shandong University of Finance and Economics), Yuanyuan Guo (0000-0003-0112-3005, Ningbo University, corresponding author), Zehui Yu (0009-0003-1728-7829, Shandong Women’s University)
Year2026
Volume264
Pages106515
Publication date2026-04-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueActa Psychologica (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.106515
PMID41734735
OpenAlexW7131107123
LanguageEN
References cited25

This study explores how government AI employees shape public participation perception and clarifies the psychological mechanisms behind this influence. Based on survey data from 470 users of Shenzhen's "Shen Xiao-i," this study integrates technological, emotional, and cultural perspectives to explain how individuals form participation judgments. Emotional appraisal plays a central role, as higher emotional appraisal significantly enhances public participation perception. Service information perception reflects the cognitive process, since clear, responsive, and transparent information strengthens public participation perception, especially in high-collectivism contexts where information also conveys a sense of social inclusion. Service system perception influences individual agency, as perceived system friction reduces public participation perception among people with low collectivism. Service quality perception further supports these relationships by shaping users' overall evaluation of service experiences. The findings show that emotional appraisal enhances the positive influence of service information perception on public participation perception. Collectivism influences these pathways, while education and occupation tend to increase the perception of public participation. In contrast, age generally leads to a decrease in this perception. Overall, this study provides an interdisciplinary understanding of AI-enabled governance by identifying emotional appraisal as the key psychological factor, defining service information perception as a culturally influenced cognitive resource, and demonstrating that service system perception can weaken agency, particularly in individualistic contexts

Cognition · Collectivism · Government (linguistics) · Individualism · Perception · Public participation · Public service · Service (business) · Artificial Intelligence Applications · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance

  • Artificial Intelligence and the Public Sector—Applications and Challenges

    Bernd W Wirtz, Jan C Weyerer et al.•International Journal of Public…•2019

  • Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Ella Glikson, Anita Williams Woolley•Academy of Management Annals•2020

  • Trust and risk in e-government adoption

    Open Access•France Belanger, Lemuria Carter•The Journal of Strategic…•2008

  • Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology

    Viswanath Venkatesh, Venkatesh Venkatesh et al.•MIS Quarterly•2012

  • Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error

    Open Access•Claes Fornell, David F Larcker•Journal of Marketing Research•1981

  • Investigating the impact of culture dimensions on Chinese citizens' continuous use of e-government websites

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Guo, Guo Yuanyuan•Acta Psychologica•2024

  • Government regulation or industry self-regulation of AI? Investigating the relationships between uncertainty avoidance, people’s AI risk perceptions, and their regulatory preferences in Europe

    Open Access•Bartosz Wilczek, Sina Thäsler-Kordonouri et al.•AI & Society•2025

  • Cultural Influence on Koreans' Continuous Use Behavior

    Guo Yuanyuan, Yuanyuan Guo•Korea Observer - Institute of…•2022

  • Exploring the impact of national culture on the development of open government data

    Open Access•Xiaojuan Zhang, Farhan Khan et al.•Big Data & Society•2023

  • Justice, Fairness, and Employee Reactions

    Jason A Colquitt, Kate P Zipay•Annual Review of Organizational…•2015

  • The virtual sphere

    Open Access•Zizi Papacharissi•New Media & Society•2002

  • Mapping the challenges of Artificial Intelligence in the public sector

    Open Access•Tara Qian Sun, Rony Medaglia•Government Information Quarterly•2018

  • The impact of chatbots on public service provision

    Open Access•Anna Grøndahl Larsen, Asbjørn Følstad•Government Information Quarterly•2024

  • Defining digital transformation

    Open Access•Ines Mergel, Noella Edelmann et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Trustworthy AI in the public sector

    Open Access•Alexander Berman, Karl De Fine Licht et al.•Technology in Society•2024

  • The Question of Participation

    Cheryl Simrell King, Kathryn M Feltey et al.•Public Administration Review•1998

  • The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits

    Edward L Deci, Richard M Ryan•Psychological Inquiry•2000

  • Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance

    Open Access•Archon Fung•Public Administration Review•2006

  • Citizens’ trust in AI-enabled government systems

    Yi-Fan Wang, Yu‐che Chen et al.•Information Polity•2024

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae