Us and them
Anticipated imitation between groups
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21283266 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Maximilian Marschner (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Carl Michael Galang (0000-0002-4088-8476, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Marcel Brass (Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 267 |
| Pages | 107058 |
| Publication date | 2026-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Psychologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0001-6918 • E-ISSN: 1873-6297 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.actpsy.2026.107058 |
| PMID | 42208218 |
| OpenAlex | W7162636307 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 44 |
People's propensity to imitate others' actions is well documented. However, research on imitation remains mainly focused on dyadic social interactions, disregarding that we often interact with others as parts of larger groups. Extending sparse research on imitation beyond dyadic interactions, the current study investigated how anticipated imitation effects become modulated in social interactions between groups. Participants performed an anticipated imitation task in a virtual environment depicting four animated hands that were controlled by the participant, a virtual co-actor, and two virtual agents of an opposing dyad, respectively. Participants responded to symbolic stimuli by lifting their index or middle finger and performed the task either with or without their co-actor, while either one or both agent(s) of the opposing dyad imitated their responses. Our findings revealed partial evidence that participants' task performance was affected by congruency relations between groups: Acting together with another co-actor was facilitated when both vs. one agent(s) of the opposing dyad imitated participants' responses, while the opposite trend emerged when participants performed the task without their co-actor. However, this group-level congruency effect was only evident for two out of four analyzed performance measures. Further explorative analysis showed that this effect was moderated by participants' general response speed and was obscured by participants who responded relatively fast on the task. Our findings indicate that anticipated responses of multiple interaction partners can play a causal role in controlling one's own contributions to a social interaction and provide novel evidence that joint task representations encode actions on a group level
ENCODE · Group (periodic table) · Imitation · Joint (building) · Joint attention · Task (project management) · Task group · Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics · Interdisciplinary Cultural and Social Studies · Posthumanist Ethics and Activism
Perception and Action Planning
Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control
Combining Speed and Accuracy in Cognitive Psychology
The Theory of Event Coding (TEC)
The Chameleon Effect as Social Glue
G*Power 3
Anticipated imitation of multiple agents
Me or we? Action-outcome learning in synchronous joint action
A review of contemporary ideomotor theory
Motor representation in acting together
The Case for Motor Involvement in Perceiving Conspecifics
Automatic imitation
Automatic imitation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|