Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perception and Pluralism

Leibniz’s Theological Derivation of Perception in Connection with Platonism, Rationalism and Substance Monism

Bibliographic Data

ID21291597
AuthorsGaston Robert (0000-0002-9110-5187, Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Liberal Arts Diagonal Las Torres 2640, Peñalolén, Santiago, room 232-B Santiago USA, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume102
Issue1
Pages56-101
Publication date2020-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv für Geschichte der Philosophie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-9101 • E-ISSN: 0943-3988
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/agph-2020-1003
OpenAlexW3009254643
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited21

This article discusses Leibniz’s claim that every substance is endowed with the property of perception in connection with Platonism, rationalism and the problem of substance monism. It is argued that Leibniz’s ascription of perception to every substance relies on his Platonic conception of finite things as imitations of God, in whom there is ‘infinite perception’. Leibniz’s Platonism, however, goes beyond the notion of imitation, including also the emanative causal relation and the logical (i.e. definitional) priority of the absolute over the limited. It is proposed that Leibniz’s endorsement of Platonism, in conjunction with some rationalist elements of his philosophy, implies a monistic conception of particulars as modifications of a single substance. Following some scholars and opposing others, the article offers evidence that Leibniz accepted this implication during the last years of his Paris period. However, it is further argued that it was precisely the idea of perception as a property of every substance that allowed Leibniz to find a way out of monism after that period. More specifically, the article defends the view that what made room for ontological pluralism within Leibniz’s rationalist and Platonic outlook was the idea that perception is the property which constitutes the very being of substances: substances are their perceptions

Empiricism · Epistemology · Metaphysics · Monism · Perception · Platonism · Pluralism (philosophy) · Property (philosophy) · Rationalism · Historical Philosophy and Science · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

  • Panentheistic, monistic, non-necessitarian

    Gaston Robert•British Journal for the History…•2023

  • Leibniz

    Open Access•Maria Rosa Antognazza•Leibniz•2008

  • Multiplicity and Unity of being in Aristotle

    Enrico Berti•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•2001

  • The Hypercategorematic Infinite

    Maria Rosa Antognazza, The Leibniz Society of North America•The Leibniz review•2015

  • Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas

    te Velde, te Velde te Velde•Participation and Substantiality…•1995

  • The Priority of the Perfect in the Philosophical Theology of the Continental Rationalists

    Robert Merrihew Adams•Rationalism, Platonism and God•2007

  • Leibniz on Divine Concurrence

    Sukjae Lee•The Philosophical Review•2004

  • Leibniz on Divine Concurrence

    Open Access•John Whipple•Philosophy Compass•2010

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae