Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Die Tonarten der klassischen Vokalpolyphonie im Konflikt der deutschen Musikwissenschaft

Bibliographic Data

ID21291773
AuthorsHelmut Loos (0000-0002-4742-3639, Leipzig University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume77
Issue3
Pages239
Publication date2020-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchiv für Musikwissenschaft (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-9292 • E-ISSN: 2366-2794
PublisherWissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft mbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.25162/afmw-2020-0011
OpenAlexW3093482849
LanguageDE

Since its revival in German musicology in the 1950s, Renaissance research has been accompanied by a fundamental methodological dispute between Carl Dahlhaus and Bernhard Meier. In his habilitation thesis of 1968, Dahlhaus attacked Meier’s rigorously historical, early studies that were based on the definitive importance of church modes for sixteenth-century composition. Dahlhaus, on the other hand, propagated an authentic-plagal general mode in the development towards major-minor tonality. Meier offered a fundamental critique of this approach in his 1974 publication The Modes of Classical Vocal Polyphony. Initially exposed not only to objective criticism but also to hostility, its importance as a scholarly treatise, fundamental to the understanding of the sixteenth-century music, only came to be appreciated posthumously

Art · Art history · Criticism · German · German Literature · Habilitation · Humanities · Linguistics · Literary criticism · Literature · Musicology · Polyphony · The Renaissance · Classics · Diverse Musicological Studies · Historical Influence and Diplomacy · Musicology and Musical Analysis · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae