On the Possibility of Testimonial Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21293541 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rush T Stewart (0000-0003-2777-5263, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Michael Nielsen (0000-0002-3161-6823, Australian National University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 98 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 732-746 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2019.1706183 |
| OpenAlex | W3012826010 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 15 |
Recent impossibility theorems for fair risk assessment extend to the domain of epistemic justice. We translate the relevant model, demonstrating that the problems of fair risk assessment and just credibility assessment are structurally the same. We motivate the fairness criteria involved in the theorems as also being appropriate in the setting of testimonial justice. Any account of testimonial justice that implies the fairness/justice criteria must be abandoned, on pain of triviality
Business · Credibility · Economic Justice · Epistemology · Impossibility · Political science · Sociology · Testimonial · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Free Will and Agency · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Highly cited | No |