Engineering Human Beauty with More Caution
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21293579 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xinkan Zhao (0000-0002-9123-7921, Peking University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 777-782 |
| Publication date | 2024-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2024.2314154 |
| OpenAlex | W4392783459 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Ravasio (2023) recently presents an interesting discussion of strategies to deal with lookism. He categorizes strategies into revisionary and redistributive ones and argues for a case against the former. This note is a critical response to both the taxonomy and the evaluation. I argue that the taxonomy needs to be improved and that the case against revisionary strategies cannot be maintained
Beauty · Biology · Economics · Epistemology · Management science · Taxonomy (biology) · Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies · Ecology · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |