Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Uncoordinated Norms of Belief

Bibliographic Data

ID21293681
AuthorsOliver Traldi (0000-0002-5116-7850, University of Notre Dame, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume101
Issue3
Pages625-637
Publication date2023-07-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00048402.2022.2030378
OpenAlexW4220874269
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited24

If it is ethically wrong to hold some beliefs, there may be a conflict between the demands of morality and the demands of rationality. A recent theory holds that no such conflict exists: any morally wrong belief is also irrational to hold, made irrational through a phenomenon of radical moral encroachment. In this paper, I argue that radical moral encroachment fails to coordinate ethical and epistemic norms, given plausible epistemological principles and various substantive accounts of which beliefs are morally wrong, including those endorsed by radical moral encroachment theorists themselves

Epistemology · Irrational number · Morality · Rationality · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Ethics in medical practice · Free Will and Agency · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Oliver Traldi•Political Beliefs•2024

  • Acceptance and the ethics of belief

    Open Access•Laura K Soter•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • The structure of moral encroachment

    Open Access•Jaakko Hirvelä•Philosophical Studies•2023

  • Reframing Epistemic Partiality

    Open Access•Laura K Soter•Journal of Ethics and Social…•2025

  • Wronging in believing

    Open Access•Lucas Crawford•Synthese•2025

  • Knowledge and Practical Interests

    Jason Stanley•KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICAL INTERESTS.•2005

  • Knowledge in an Uncertain World

    Jeremy Fantl, Morag Mcgrath et al.•Knowledge in an uncertain world•2009

  • Correcting The Guide to Objective Chance

    Ned Hall•Mind•1994

  • The wrongs of racist beliefs

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Studies•2019

  • IX—Moral Encroachment

    Open Access•Sarah Mo, Sarah Moss•Proceedings of the Aristotelian…•2018

  • Evidentialism

    Open Access•Richard Feldman, Earl Conee•Philosophical Studies•1985

  • What we epistemically owe to each other

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Studies•2019

  • When Beliefs Wrong

    Mark Schroeder•Philosophical Topics•2018

  • Radical moral encroachment

    Open Access•Rima Basu•Philosophical Issues•2019

  • Knowledge and Action

    John Hawthorne, Jason Stanley et al.•The Journal of Philosophy•2008

  • Symposium: Chance and Credence

    David Lewis•Mind•1994

  • On the epistemic costs of implicit bias

    Open Access•Tamar Szabó Gendler•Philosophical Studies•2011

  • "What Is "Naturalized Epistemology

    Jaegwon Kim•Philosophical Perspectives•1988

  • The rational impermissibility of accepting (some) racial generalizations

    Open Access•Renée Jorgensen Bolinger•Synthese•2020

  • Belief, credence, and moral encroachment

    Open Access•James Fritz, Elizabeth G Jackson•Synthese•2021

  • How to argue for pragmatic encroachment

    Open Access•Blake Roeber•Synthese•2020

  • Dilemmic Epistemology

    Open Access•Nick Hughes•Synthese•2019

  • Contextualism and Knowledge Attributions

    Keith Derose•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•1992

Citations per year1.67
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae