Against Disquotation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21293733 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Andrew Bacon (University of Southern California), Jeremy Goodman (0000-0002-1293-0243, University of Southern California) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 711-726 |
| Publication date | 2022-10-02 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2021.1933114 |
| OpenAlex | W4254319878 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 27 |
We argue against the disquotational meaning schema—‘φ’ means that φ—and suggest that rejecting it is the key to resolving further intensional paradoxes about the limits of thought
Classical Philosophy and Thought · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
The Construction of Logical Space
Language and Nature
Mathematical Logic as Based on the Theory of Types
Platonism and Quantification
The logic of paradox
To Be F Is To Be G
Radical Anti‐disquotationalism
Quantifying in
Truth and meaning
Can the Classical Logician Avoid the Revenge Paradoxes
Classical Opacity
The Logic of Opacity
| Citations per year | 0.2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2021 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |