Modal Realism and Anthropic Reasoning
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21293739 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mario Gómez‐Torrente (0000-0002-5957-6544, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 925-938 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Australasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/00048402.2024.2379274 |
| OpenAlex | W4401102542 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 12 |
Some arguments against David Lewis’s modal realism seek to exploit apparent inconsistencies between it and anthropic reasoning. A recent argument, in particular, seeks to exploit an inconsistency between modal realism and typicality anthropic premises, premises common in the literature on physical multiverses, to the effect that observers who are like human observers in certain respects must be typical in the relevant multiverse. Here I argue that typicality premises are not applicable to the description of Lewis’s metaphysical multiverse, where the proportions of metaphysically possible observers possessing the pertinent properties can be independently established by metaphysical reasoning. However, other kinds of reasonable anthropic premises can be seen to be consistent with and usable within modal realism
Anthropic principle · Argument (complex analysis) · Epistemology · Exploit · Metaphysics · Modal · Modal logic · Realism · Chemistry · Computer Science · Philosophy · Philosophy and History of Science · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |