Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Metasemantics of Indefinite Extensibility

Bibliographic Data

ID21293779
AuthorsVera Flocke (Indiana University Bloomington, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume99
Issue4
Pages817-834
Publication date2021-10-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralasian Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0004-8402 • E-ISSN: 1470-6828
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00048402.2020.1822894
OpenAlexW3096949452
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited30

Generality relativism is the view that any domain of quantification can always be expanded. The view promises to resolve a broad range of paradoxes, but, without an explanation of how domains expand, it sounds very mysterious. Proponents of linguistic versions of generality relativism try to demystify the view by likening domain expansions to semantic change. They think that domains expand when we re-interpret certain terms so that, upon re-interpretation, the quantifiers range over more things. This article makes trouble for linguistic approaches. According to the so-called charge of ineffability, generality relativism cannot be asserted in a coherent manner—given that asserting the view requires generalising over absolutely all domains of quantification. Generality relativists typically try to answer the charge with the help of modal operators; but linguistic approaches interpret these operators in semantically and syntactically idiosyncratic ways. I argue that, because of these commitments, linguistic approaches ultimately do not have a good response to the charge of ineffability

Domain (mathematical analysis) · Epistemology · Generality · Interpretation (philosophy) · Linguistics · Relativism · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Humean Rationalism

    Open Access•David Builes•Philosophical Studies•2024

  • Context

    Robert Stalnaker•Context•2014

  • Index, Context, and Content

    Davis Lewis•Philosophy and Grammar•1980

  • ‘Everything’

    Open Access•Vann Mcgee•Between Logic and Intuition•2000

  • Everything

    Open Access•T Williamson•Philosophical Perspectives•2003

  • Propositions and Compositionality

    Open Access•Juhani Yli‐vakkuri•Philosophical Perspectives•2013

  • Frege

    Robert Buhr, Robert D Buhr et al.•Language•1983

  • Against the identification of assertoric content with compositional value

    Open Access•Brian Rabern•Synthese•2012

  • Quantifier Variance and Indefinite Extensibility

    Jared Warren•The Philosophical Review•2017

  • Quantification and Realism

    Open Access•Michael Glanzberg•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2004

  • Monsters and the Theoretical Role of Context

    Open Access•Brian Rabern, D Ball•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2017

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae