Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A product-technology portfolio alignment approach for food industry

A multi-criteria decision making with z-numbers

Bibliographic Data

ID21295282
AuthorsNima Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, Nima Garousi Mokhtarzadedeh (0000-0002-7265-8026, University of Tehran), H A Mahdiraji (0000-0002-8382-6603, Coventry University), Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi (0000-0003-3083-6119, Coventry University), Arash Soltani (0000-0002-2149-3487, University of Tehran), AliAsghar Abbasi Kamardi, Ali Asghar Abbasi Kamardi (0000-0001-6074-6128, University of Tehran)
Year2020
Volume122
Issue12
Pages3947-3967
Publication date2020-06-03
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-02-2020-0115
OpenAlexW3026798414
LanguageEN
Citations received13
References cited50

Purpose To design a novel hybrid approach to illustrate a reciprocal alignment to integrate future products and technologies. This mixed qualitative-quantitative method aims to optimize the final product portfolio and production technologies alignment in the food industry. Design/methodology/approach A list of products and technologies is extracted and evaluated by experts employing Market Attractiveness and Ease of Implementations Matrix (MA-EI) for products and attractiveness and technological Capability Matrix (A-C) for technologies. Weights of high-scored alternatives are attained applying the Z-number extension of Best Worst Method (ZBWM). After the product-technology matrix is formed and the alignment scores of each pair are determined by experts. Subsequently, final scores are computed, and a framework is proposed by electing high-ranked products and technology of each cluster to form the aligned product and technology portfolios of a food and hygiene industry company. Findings By employing an uncertain multicriteria decision-making approach besides product and technology matrices in a food industry corporation, among 40 technology and product, 13 products by 6 technologies are proposed. Thus, only six technology are necessary to manufacture the highly important and effective products. Originality/value The combination of product and technology analysis matrixes with an uncertain decision-making approach is considered as a novel approach in this research. Moreover, the distinctness between the present study and other researches is the concurrent unified aspect of product portfolio and technology optimization and its implementation in the planning discussion, especially in the food industry

Business · Manufacturing engineering · New product development · Portfolio · Process management · Product (mathematics) · Computer Science · Engineering · Marketing · Mathematics · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Technology Assessment and Management

  • Knowledge management capability, entrepreneurial creativity, entrepreneurial intensity and firm performance

    Open Access•Nima Garousi Mokhtarzadedeh, Ismail Jafarpanah et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Key indicators of ethical challenges in digital healthcare

    Open Access•Mojtaba Rezaei, Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • Dynamic performance development of entrepreneurial ecosystem in the agricultural sector

    Open Access•Mahnaz Hosseinzadeh, Marzieh Samadi Foroushani et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Organic pioneers and the sustainability transformation of the German food market

    Open Access•Johanna Stöhr, Christian Herzig•British Food Journal•2022

  • Branding advantage of agri-food companies in competitive export markets

    Open Access•Hashem Aghazadeh, Elham Beheshti Jazan Abadi et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Keep dreaming

    Open Access•Simona Leonelli, Lea Iaia et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Tourist's satisfaction with local food effect behavioral intention in Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Shafique Ur Rehman, Sarminah Samad et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Sustainable innovation strategies and firm performance

    Open Access•Carmine Garzia, Patrizia Gazzola et al.•British Food Journal•2025

  • Identification, analysis and improvement of red meat supply chain strategies considering the impact of Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Farshid Riahi Dorcheh, Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha et al.•British Food Journal•2021

  • The correlates of energy management practices and sales performance of small family food firms in Turkey

    Open Access•Adah-Kole Emmanuel Onjewu, Elmar Puntaier et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • What are the fundamental knowledge-sharing drivers of small family businesses in the restaurant and fast-food industry

    Open Access•Mojtaba Rezaei, Guido Giovando et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • International collaboration formation in entrepreneurial food industry

    Open Access•Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha, Saeed Alaei et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Exploring agricultural entrepreneurship and new technologies

    Open Access•Silvana Secinaro, Francesca Dal Mas et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method

    Open Access•Jafar Rezaei•Omega•2016

  • Fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications

    Open Access•Sen Guo, Haoran Zhao•Knowledge-Based Systems•2017

  • Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method

    Open Access•Jafar Rezaei•Omega•2015

Citations per year2.6
Citation span2021 - 2025 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae