A product-technology portfolio alignment approach for food industry
A multi-criteria decision making with z-numbers
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21295282 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Nima Garousi Mokhtarzadeh, Nima Garousi Mokhtarzadedeh (0000-0002-7265-8026, University of Tehran), H A Mahdiraji (0000-0002-8382-6603, Coventry University), Vahid Jafari-Sadeghi (0000-0003-3083-6119, Coventry University), Arash Soltani (0000-0002-2149-3487, University of Tehran), AliAsghar Abbasi Kamardi, Ali Asghar Abbasi Kamardi (0000-0001-6074-6128, University of Tehran) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 122 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 3947-3967 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-03 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Food Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/bfj-02-2020-0115 |
| OpenAlex | W3026798414 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 13 |
| References cited | 50 |
Purpose To design a novel hybrid approach to illustrate a reciprocal alignment to integrate future products and technologies. This mixed qualitative-quantitative method aims to optimize the final product portfolio and production technologies alignment in the food industry. Design/methodology/approach A list of products and technologies is extracted and evaluated by experts employing Market Attractiveness and Ease of Implementations Matrix (MA-EI) for products and attractiveness and technological Capability Matrix (A-C) for technologies. Weights of high-scored alternatives are attained applying the Z-number extension of Best Worst Method (ZBWM). After the product-technology matrix is formed and the alignment scores of each pair are determined by experts. Subsequently, final scores are computed, and a framework is proposed by electing high-ranked products and technology of each cluster to form the aligned product and technology portfolios of a food and hygiene industry company. Findings By employing an uncertain multicriteria decision-making approach besides product and technology matrices in a food industry corporation, among 40 technology and product, 13 products by 6 technologies are proposed. Thus, only six technology are necessary to manufacture the highly important and effective products. Originality/value The combination of product and technology analysis matrixes with an uncertain decision-making approach is considered as a novel approach in this research. Moreover, the distinctness between the present study and other researches is the concurrent unified aspect of product portfolio and technology optimization and its implementation in the planning discussion, especially in the food industry
Business · Manufacturing engineering · New product development · Portfolio · Process management · Product (mathematics) · Computer Science · Engineering · Marketing · Mathematics · Multi-Criteria Decision Making · Sustainable Supply Chain Management · Technology Assessment and Management
Knowledge management capability, entrepreneurial creativity, entrepreneurial intensity and firm performance
Key indicators of ethical challenges in digital healthcare
Dynamic performance development of entrepreneurial ecosystem in the agricultural sector
Organic pioneers and the sustainability transformation of the German food market
Branding advantage of agri-food companies in competitive export markets
Keep dreaming
Tourist's satisfaction with local food effect behavioral intention in Covid-19 pandemic
Sustainable innovation strategies and firm performance
Identification, analysis and improvement of red meat supply chain strategies considering the impact of Covid-19 pandemic
The correlates of energy management practices and sales performance of small family food firms in Turkey
What are the fundamental knowledge-sharing drivers of small family businesses in the restaurant and fast-food industry
International collaboration formation in entrepreneurial food industry
Exploring agricultural entrepreneurship and new technologies
| Citations per year | 2.6 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2021 - 2025 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |