Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Understanding Ethiopian farmers' intention to adopt biofortified orange-flesh sweet potatoes

Bibliographic Data

ID21295628
AuthorsLidya Samuel (0009-0000-8736-5851), Marcia Dutra De Barcellos (0000-0002-4311-2921), Mulugeta Damie Watabaji (0000-0003-3512-2385), Hans De Steur (0000-0003-1340-0882)
Year2025
Publication date2025-02-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Food Journal (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/bfj-04-2024-0384
OpenAlexW4407890227
LanguageEN
References cited82

Purpose Biofortification is a promising strategy for addressing malnutrition and food insecurity by enriching staple crops with nutrients. However, farmers’ adoption is crucial for their success. This study aims to shed light on Ethiopian farmers' intentions to adopt biofortified orange-fleshed sweet potatoes (OFSP) using the motivation, opportunity and ability (MOA) framework. Design/methodology/approach This study used data from a cross-sectional survey of 370 sweet potato farmers in Ethiopia. Binary logistic regression analysis was employed to examine the factors influencing farmers' intention to adopt OFSP. Findings Ability-, motivation- and opportunity-related factors significantly influenced adoption intention. Specifically, knowledge of OFSP benefits, production skills, crop characteristics and access to institutional services positively influences adoption. However, farming experience has a negative effect. Practical implications These findings emphasize the importance of educating farmers about OFSP’s high vitamin A content and favourable agronomic features. Additionally, understanding farmers' experiences and enhancing their production skills are crucial for increasing adoption rates. Targeted educational programs and support services can address these gaps and deficiencies. Originality/value This study is the first to analyse Ethiopian farmers' adoption of OFSP using an MOA framework. It offers a novel approach to understanding the complex interplay of psychological factors that influence adoption intentions. Furthermore, this study provides valuable insights into the Ethiopian context, filling a gap in the literature. These findings contribute to the development of targeted strategies for promoting biofortified crops in Ethiopia and other similar global contexts

Advertising · Agricultural economics · Biology · Business · Economics · Flesh · Orange (colour) · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Food Science · Marketing

  • Adaptive management in agricultural innovation systems

    Open Access•Laurens Klerkx, Noelle Aarts et al.•Agricultural Systems•2010

  • The theory of planned behavior

    Open Access•Icek Ajzen•Organizational Behavior and Human…•1991

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • Drivers and barriers for the adoption of hazard-resistant construction knowledge in Nepal

    Open Access•Ella Hendriks, Mia Stokmans et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2020

  • Factors influencing farmers’ dis-adoption and retention decisions for biofortified crops

    Wellington Jogo, Temesgen Bocher et al.•Agrekon•2021

  • Modeling farmers’ adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China

    Open Access•Xin Yang, Xiaohe Zhou et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2022

  • What determines consumption of nutritious foods by the urban poor in Africa

    Open Access•Christine Kiria Chege, Stella Namazzi et al.•British Food Journal•2022

  • Effect of Farmers’ Multidimensional Beliefs on Adoption of Biofortified Crops

    Open Access•Kelvin Mashisia Shikuku, Julius J Okello et al.•The Journal of Development Studies•2019

  • National incidence, prevalence and disability-adjusted life years (Dalys) of common micronutrient deficiencies in Ethiopia from 1990 to 2017

    Open Access•Hamid Yimam Hassen, Jemal Haidar et al.•Global Health Action•2020

  • Adoption of Precision Farming Tools

    Open Access•Yari Vecchio, Giulio Paolo Agnusdei et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Motivations and Mental Models Associated with Smallholder Farmers’ Adoption of Improved Agricultural Technology

    Open Access•Julius J Okello, Yuan Zhou et al.•European Journal of Development…•2018

  • Impacts of extension access and cooperative membership on technology adoption and household welfare

    Open Access•Tesfamicheal Wossen, Tahirou Abdoulaye et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2017

  • Farmers’ valuation of transgenic biofortified sorghum for nutritional improvement in Burkina Faso

    Open Access•Obi Chinedu, E I R Sanou et al.•Food Policy•2018

  • Land constraints and agricultural intensification in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Derek D Headey, Derek Headey et al.•Food Policy•2014

  • Adoption of agricultural technology in the developing world

    Open Access•Sacha Ruzzante, Ricardo Labarta et al.•World Development•2021

  • Identifying effective message-framing techniques in behaviour change communication for healthy diets

    Open Access•Kaleb Shiferaw Jada, Kaleb Jada et al.•Appetite•2022

  • Climate-smart cowpea adoption and welfare effects of comprehensive agricultural training programs

    Open Access•Emmanuel Martey, Edward Martey et al.•Technology in Society•2021

  • Golden Rice and technology adoption theory

    Open Access•Dominic Glover, Sung Kyu Kim et al.•Technology in Society•2020

  • Exploratory Factor Analysis

    Open Access•Marley W Watkins•Journal of Black Psychology•2018

  • Limits to biofortification

    Matthew A Schnurr, L Addison et al.•The Journal of Peasant Studies•2020

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae