Connecting worlds
A bibliometric analysis of corporate political activity and corporate social responsibility in the agricultural sector
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21296564 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stella Moliterni (0009-0004-1302-6725, Universitat Jaume I , Castellón de la Plana), Enrique Planells-Artigot (0000-0002-0208-9948, ESIC University, ESIC Business and Marketing School) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 128 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2480-2500 |
| Publication date | 2026-05-28 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Food Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-070X • E-ISSN: 1758-4108 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/bfj-05-2025-0708 |
| OpenAlex | W7125373922 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 62 |
Purpose Academic interest in the relationship between corporate political activity (CPA) and corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been steadily increasing, with an emphasis on understanding the dynamics of these two areas of nonmarket corporate strategy Despite the relevance of this topic, especially in relation to the agricultural sector, research remains fragmented, largely because of the diverse perspectives of scholars shaped by their varying disciplinary backgrounds. Consequently, a critical knowledge gap remains regarding the bibliometric patterns and trends in the adoption of nonmarket strategies by agricultural actors to promote socioeconomic progress. Design/methodology/approach This research focuses on the CPA–CSR nexus in the agricultural sector, where actors have the potential to transcend traditional business boundaries and help promote a more equitable socioeconomic landscape. The study uses bibliometric analysis to explore 1,053 publications indexed in the Web of Science Core Collection database. Findings By mapping co-citation networks, geographical trends, and keyword co-occurrence, this study identifies key research clusters and gaps in the literature, offering innovative insights at the intersection of nonmarket strategies and regional influence. Originality/value This paper contributes to the CPA-CSR literature by offering a comprehensive bibliometric overview. It provides insights into the evolving landscape of agricultural political engagement and its implications for regional socio-economic development, laying a foundation for future interdisciplinary research at the intersection of business, policy, and society
Agriculture · Corporate social responsibility · Discipline · Nexus (standard) · Nonmarket forces · Politics · Socioeconomic status · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Cooperative Studies and Economics · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Political Corporate Social Responsibility
Stakeholder theory
Corporate Political Activity
Empirical study of the Environmental Kuznets curve and Environmental Sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA
Achieving sustainable performance in a data-driven agriculture supply chain
How to conduct a bibliometric analysis
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses
A statistical and machine learning methodology to model rural depopulation risk and explore its attenuation through agricultural land use management
Bridging fields
Inter-organizational relationships in agri-food sector
Sustainability performance evaluation of agricultural cooperatives’ operations
Linkages between agricultural policies, productivity and environmental sustainability
Mapping the research domains on work in agriculture. A bibliometric review from Scopus database
Politicized CSR
Mainstreaming climate change adaptation into the European Union’s development assistance
Which type of producer organization is (more) inclusive? Dynamics of farmers’ membership and participation in the decision‐making process
Community supported agriculture
An integrated conceptual framework for the study of agricultural cooperatives
A Tale of Two Kingdoms
Corporate Social Responsibility and institutional theory
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |