Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

AI ‐powered vocabulary learning for lower primary school students

Bibliographic Data

ID21297380
AuthorsYun Wen (0000-0002-6334-9790, National Institution of Education Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore, corresponding author), Ming Ming Chiu (0000-0002-5721-1971, Education University of Hong Kong, corresponding author), Mingming Chiu (The Education University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China), Xinyu Guo (0000-0001-9550-0769, National Institution of Education Nanyang Technological University Singapore Singapore), Zhan Wang (0000-0002-1335-4698, The Education University of Hong Kong Hong Kong SAR China)
Year2025
Volume56
Issue2
Pages734-754
Publication date2025-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/bjet.13537
OpenAlexW4404547613
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited52

In this exploratory mixed‐methods study, we introduce and test our AI‐powered vocabulary learning system—ARCHe, which embeds four AI functions: (1) automatic feedback towards for pronunciation, (2) automatic feedback for towards handwriting, (3) automatic scoring for student‐generated sentences and (4) automatic recommendations. Specifically, our study of 140 students taught by six teachers in three primary schools in Singapore explores the links between these AI functions and students' learning engagement and outcomes via the analysis of their pre‐ and post‐tests, post‐surveys, focus group discussions and artefacts created via ARCHe. Results show improved Chinese character and vocabulary test scores after using ARCHe. Students' perceptions of ARCHe automatic recommendations and feedback towards pronunciation positively influence their emotional engagement. Also, students who perceived ARCHe automatic recommendations and feedback on handwriting more favourably than others reported greater cognitive engagement. Meanwhile, students whose groups created more sentences in classroom‐based collaborative learning than others were more likely to show learning gains. This study provides insights for learning designers and educators on AI's potential in language learning, with recommendations for future research directions. Practitioner notes What is already known about this topic AI‐enabled automatic feedback or recommendations might improve students' learning engagement, scaffold their learning processes and enhance their learning outcomes. Students' perceived usefulness of a mobile learning system positively influences their learning engagement. Leveraging AI technology and adopting innovative feedback approaches can improve mobile language learning experiences for students of varying needs and preferences. What this paper adds This study introduced and tested a self‐designed AI‐powered vocabulary learning system for young students—ARCHe, which embeds four AI functions (feedback for both pronunciation and handwriting, scoring of sentences and recommendations). Students who perceived ARCHe feedback towards pronunciation or recommendations as more useful than others showed greater emotional engagement. Students who viewed ARCHe feedback towards handwriting as more useful than others wrote sentences with greater complexity during group activities in class. By contrast, those viewing ARCHe recommendations as more useful than others did wrote shorter sentences. Students in groups that wrote more sentences during their class activities were more likely to show learning gains (unlike the non‐significant effects of home‐based individual activities). Implications for practice and/or policy This study contributes to the existing body of knowledge in AI‐enhanced language learning by showcasing how AI can empower mobile‐based vocabulary learning for young students. The study sheds light on specific AI functions that affect language learning engagement. The findings offer specific recommendations for classroom instruction and AI system upgrades and provide insights into the development of online language learning with AI

Linguistics · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Primary (astronomy) · Teaching method · Vocabulary · Vocabulary development · Vocabulary Learning · AI in Service Interactions · Computer Science · E-Learning and COVID-19 · Psychology · Technology-Enhanced Education Studies

  • How do high-performers and low-performers differently engage in collaborative creative problem solving with a conversational GenAI chatbot?

    Open Access•Wenjie Ren, Jie Li et al.•Thinking Skills and Creativity•2026

  • A Conceptual Framework to Understand the Relationships Between Digital Wellness and Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Jennifer Laffier, Aalyia Rehman et al.•Cyberpsychology Behavior and…•2025

  • Automatic item generation for educational assessments

    Yishen Song, Junlei Du et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Understanding CFL learners’ cognitive and affective engagement in seamless Chinese vocabulary learning

    Open Access•Xiaosheng Zhou, Goh Ying Yingsoon•Current Psychology•2026

  • Children's Conceptions of AI , Ethics and Intelligence in China

    Open Access•Ziyan Lin, Yun Dai•British Journal of Educational…•2026

  • Hybrid intelligence

    Open Access•Sanna Järvelä, Guoying Zhao et al.•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • A meta-synthesis study on the use of artificial intelligence in primary education

    Open Access•Seyat Polat, Gürkan Sarıdaş•AI & Society•2026

  • Leveraging self-regulation theory in mobile learning

    Open Access•Yin Yang, Chun Lai et al.•Asia Pacific Journal of Education•2026

  • Acceptance of AI tools and its impact on communication strategies and vocabulary adaptation

    Open Access•Tuong Cao Dinh, Vy Khanh Vo Trinh et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • How Chinese as a foreign language learners use generative AI for oral script-writing

    Open Access•Xiaodong Chen, Xiao Dong Chen et al.•Acta Psychologica•2025

  • Seamlessly Learn Vocabulary!”

    Open Access•Dayi Bai, Xiaosheng Zhou et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Engaging Language Learners in Contemporary Classrooms

    Open Access•Shanara Mercer, Sarah Mercer et al.•Engaging Language Learners in…•2020

  • Automated Evaluation of Text and Discourse with Coh-Metrix

    Open Access•D S Mcnamara, Arthur C Graesser et al.•Automated Evaluation of Text and…•2014

  • The Psychology of the Language Learner Revisited

    Zoltán Dörnyei, Stephen Ryan•The psychology of the language…•2015

  • Engagement in language learning

    Open Access•Phil Hiver, Ali H Al‐hoorie et al.•Language Teaching Research•2024

  • Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of Artificial Intelligence in Education

    Open Access•Gwo-Jen Hwang, Haoran Xie et al.•Computers and Education:…•2020

  • Using qualitative methods to develop a survey measure of math and science engagement

    Open Access•Jennifer A Fredricks, Ming-Te Wang et al.•Learning and Instruction•2016

  • Instructional Contexts for Engagement and Achievement in Reading

    John T Guthrie, Allan Wigfield et al.•Handbook of Research on Student…•2012

  • Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education

    Open Access•Qi Xia, Thomas K F Chiu et al.•Computers and Education:…•2023

  • MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D

    Open Access•Philip M McCarthy, Scott Jarvi et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2010

  • Toward an Understanding of Definitions and Measures of School Engagement and Related Terms

    Open Access•Shane R Jimerson, Emily Campos et al.•The California School Psychologist•2003

  • Exploring AI chatbot affordances in the EFL classroom

    Jaeho Jeon•Computer Assisted Language Learning•2024

  • Digital Language Learning (DLL)

    Open Access•P Li, Yu-Ju Lan et al.•Bilingualism Language and Cognition•2022

  • Artificial Intelligence image recognition using self-regulation learning strategies

    Ting-Chia Hsu, Ching Chang et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2023

  • Using artificial intelligence to foster students’ writing feedback literacy, engagement, and outcome

    Hanieh Shafiee Rad, Rasoul Alipour et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Development research on an AI English learning support system to facilitate learner-generated-context-based learning

    Open Access•Donghwa Lee, Hong-hyeon Kim et al.•Educational Technology Research…•2023

  • Augmented reality enhanced cognitive engagement

    Open Access•Yun Wen•Educational Technology Research…•2021

  • Using AI-driven chatbots to foster Chinese EFL students’ academic engagement

    Open Access•Yongliang Wang, Lina Xue•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • What matters in AI-supported learning

    Open Access•Xinghua Wang, Qian Liu et al.•Computers & Education•2023

  • Student engagement with mobile‐based assessment systems

    Open Access•Jorge Luis Bacca Acosta, Cecilia Avila•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2021

  • An investigation of scaffolded reading on EFL hypertext comprehension

    Open Access•Hui‐Fang Shang, Hui-Fang Shang•Australasian Journal of…•2015

  • Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators

    Open Access•Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I Marín et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Exploring peer support among young learners during regular EFL classroom lessons

    Open Access•Tomáš Kos•International Journal of Applied…•2023

  • Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating

    Open Access•W L Quint Oga-Baldwin•System•2019

  • Understanding vocabulary acquisition, instruction, and assessment

    Open Access•Norbert Schmitt•Language Teaching•2019

  • What Makes Students Engaged in Learning? A Time-Use Study of Within- and Between-Individual Predictors of Emotional Engagement in Low-Performing High Schools

    Open Access•Sira Park, Susan D Holloway et al.•Journal of Youth and Adolescence•2012

  • Interrelations of Behavioral, Emotional, and Cognitive School Engagement in High School Students

    Open Access•Yibing Li, Richard M Lerner•Journal of Youth and Adolescence•2013

  • Using thematic analysis in psychology

    Open Access•Braun, Virginia Braun et al.•Qualitative Research in Psychology•2006

Unique citing works11
Citations per year11
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae