Development and validation of the Digiglo, a tool for assessing the digital competence of educators
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21297451 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rafael Alarcón (0000-0001-6367-2048, Universidad de Málaga, corresponding author), Elena del Pilar Jiménez, María Isabel de Vicente-Yagüe Jara (0000-0002-2496-2971), María Isabel de Vicente‐Yagüe |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 2407-2421 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal of Educational Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0007-1013 • E-ISSN: 1467-8535 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/bjet.12919 |
| OpenAlex | W3008617400 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
| References cited | 20 |
Educators must be able to adapt to the opportunities provided by information and communication technologies, making use of those which are best suited to meeting their students' needs and identifying areas of practice in which they themselves need to develop their skills. The European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu) proposes 22 basic competences, organised into six areas, which educators should ideally acquire. The present study seeks to build on this Framework by developing and validating an assessment tool that considers a total of eight areas: the six areas covered by DigCompEdu and two new areas corresponding to extrinsic factors in the digital competence of educators. The latter refers specifically to the digital resources and support services that are available to educators in their working environment. A total of 509 teacher educators from across Spain and Latin America completed the 29‐item DIGIGLO questionnaire. Analysis of the Spanish language instrument's construct validity and psychometric properties showed it to be a valid and reliable tool for assessing the digital competence of educators across the eight areas considered. Practitioner Notes What is already known about this topic Educators must be able to adapt (habituate) to the opportunities provided by information and communication technologies. The European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators (DigCompEdu) proposes 22 basic competences, organised into six areas, which educators should ideally acquire. The speed with which digital technology is developing means that educators need to keep track of their own digital skills. What this paper adds We develop and validate an instrument for assessing educators' digital competence (the DIGIGLO) that considers external factors not included within the DigCompEdu. These external factors refer to the digital resources and support services that are available to educators in their working environment. The total score on the 29‐item questionnaire provides a measure of educators' overall digital competence across eight different areas. Implications for practice and/or policy The DIGIGLO is a brief and easy‐to‐use tool for assessing the digital competence of educators, a key issue in the educational field today. It extends the scope of the DigCompEdu Framework by including two further areas of digital competence (digital environment and extrinsic digital engagement). Application of the instrument can provide individual educators and their institutions with useful feedback about both strengths and areas in need of improvement with regard to the use of digital technology in teaching
Competence (human resources) · Knowledge management · Medical education · Pedagogy · Computer Science · Digital literacy in education · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Educational Innovations and Technology · Medicine · Psychology
Diseño de acciones formativas para mejorar las competencias digitales del profesorado
Exploring New Horizons and Challenges for Social Studies in a New Normal
Uncovering Digital Competence in Language Instruction
Gender and digital competence
Gamification in digital environments and the development of teachers’ digital competence
Assessment of the digital competencies of university instructors through use of the machine learning method
Synchronous online learning and career readiness in higher education
Exploring digital competencies in higher education
Preliminary Results from Norway, Slovenia, Portugal, Turkey, Ukraine, and Jordan
Shaping and being shaped
Digital competence and its components in basic education
Effort expectancy mediate the relationship between instructors’ digital competence and their work engagement
Reorienting the assessment of digital literacy in the twenty-first century
Understanding teaching professionals' digital competence
Digital competence of AI chatbot users
How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors
Systematic review of quantitative research on digital competences of in-service school teachers
Teaching university students through technology-mediated experiential learning
Factors associated with teachers' competence to develop students’ information literacy
Supporting digitally enhanced learning through measurement in higher education
Teacher Evaluation Patterns in Spain
Synthesizing Definitions of Digital Literacy for the Web 3.0
Validation of the DigCompThExO questionnaire for assessing exercise therapists’ competences in planning and implementing digital obesity therapy
Digital Competence of Special Education Teachers
What does decentring the human in literacy research do
How digital are ‘digital natives’ actually? Developing an instrument to measure the degree of digitalisation of university students – the DDS-Index
Digital competence profiles of first year, pre-service teachers. Analysis in the Catalan university system
Multimodality
A simulation study to investigate the use of cutoff values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models
Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis
Testing Structural Equation Models
Análisis de la Competencia Digital Docente
Visitors and Residents
Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants Part 1
A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling
On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin
Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures
Comparative fit indexes in structural models
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5.4 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 26 |